The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining structure in molecular clouds
Abstract
We descibe an automatic, objective routine for analyzing the clumpy structure in a spectral line position-position-velocity data cube. The algorithm works by first contouring the data at a multiple of the rms noise of the observations, then searches for peaks of emission which locate the clumps, and then follows them down to lower intensities. No a proiri clump profile is assumed. By creating simulated data, we test the performance of the algorithm and show that a contour map most accurately depicts internal structure at a contouring interval equal to twice the rms noise of the map. Blending of clump emission leads to small errors in mass and size determinations and in severe cases can result in a number of clumps being misidentified as a single unit, flattening the measured clump mass spectrum. The algorithm is applied to two real data sets as an example of its use. The Rosette molecular cloud is a 'typical' star-forming cloud, but in the Maddalena molecular cloud high-mass star formation is completely absent. Comparison of the two clump lists generated by the algorithm show that on a one-to-one basis the clumps in the star-forming cloud have higher peak temperatures, higher average densities, and are more gravitationally bound than in the non-star-forming cloud. Collective properties of the clumps, such as temperature-size-line-width-mass relations appear very similar, however. Contrary to the initial results reported in a previous paper (Williams & Blitz 1993), we find that the current, more thoroughly tes ted analysis finds no significant difference in the clump mass spectrum of the two clouds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties
Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A. (2006) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/502982 · Cited by 334
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Schruba, A., Hygate, A. P. S., Hu, C.-Y., Haydon, D. T., & Longmore, S. N. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1128 · Cited by 103
On the duration of the embedded phase of star formation
Kim, J., Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Schruba, A., Sandstrom, K., Barnes, A. T., Bigiel, F., Blanc, G. A., Cao, Y., Dale, D. A., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab878 · Cited by 95
DISTRIBUTION AND MASS OF DIFFUSE AND DENSE CO GAS IN THE MILKY WAY
Roman-Duval, J., Heyer, M., Brunt, C. M., Clark, P., Klessen, R., & Shetty, R. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/144 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., & Blitz, L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 428
- Pages
- 693
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2042169845
- Cited by
- 929
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining structure in molecular clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/174279
- The paper
- Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., & Blitz, L. (1994). Determining structure in molecular clouds. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/174279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.