The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties
Open accessAbstract
We review methods for measuring the sizes, line widths, and luminosities of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in molecular‐line data cubes with low resolution and sensitivity. We find that moment methods are robust and sensitive, making full use of both position and intensity information, and we recommend a standard method to measure the position angle, major and minor axis sizes, line width, and luminosity using moment methods. Without corrections for the effects of beam convolution and sensitivity to GMC properties, the resulting properties may be severely biased. This is particularly true for extragalactic observations, where resolution and sensitivity effects often bias measured values by 40% or more. We correct for finite spatial and spectral resolutions with a simple deconvolution, and we correct for sensitivity biases by extrapolating properties of a GMC to those we would expect to measure with perfect sensitivity (i.e., the 0 K isosurface). The resulting method recovers the properties of a GMC to within 10% over a large range of resolutions and sensitivities, provided the clouds are marginally resolved with a peak signal‐to‐noise ratio greater than 10. We note that interferometers systematically underestimate cloud properties, particularly the flux from a cloud. The degree of bias depends on the sensitivity of the observations and the (u,v) coverage of the observations. In an Appendix to the paper we present a conservative, new decomposition algorithm for identifying GMCs in molecular‐line observations. This algorithm treats the data in physical rather than observational units (i.e., parsecs rather than beams or arcseconds), does not produce spurious clouds in the presence of noise, and is sensitive to a range of morphologies. As a result, the output of this decomposition should be directly comparable among disparate data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Milky Way in Molecular Clouds: A New Complete CO Survey
Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., & Thaddeus, P. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/318388 · Cited by 2,115
Mass, luminosity, and line width relations of Galactic molecular clouds
Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., & Yahil, A. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165493 · Cited by 1,611
Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy
Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M., & Swenson, G. W. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527617845 · Cited by 1,446
Determining structure in molecular clouds
Williams, J. P., de Geus, E. J., & Blitz, L. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/174279 · Cited by 929
Pressure-confined clumps in magnetized molecular clouds
Bertoldi, F., & McKee, C. F. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171638 · Cited by 879
Lin, G., Adiga, U., Olson, K., Guzowski, J. F., Barnes, C. A., & Roysam, B. (2003) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.10079 · Cited by 317
The Equilibrium State of Molecular Regions in the Outer Galaxy
Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J. M., & Snell, R. L. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320218 · Cited by 315
The Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory CO Survey of the Outer Galaxy
Heyer, M. H., Brunt, C., Snell, R. L., Howe, J. E., Schloerb, F. P., & Carpenter, J. M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313086 · Cited by 297
Fukui, Y., Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., Mizuno, A., Onishi, T., Ogawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Kawamura, A., Tachihara, K., Xiao, K., et al. (1999) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/51.6.745 · Cited by 223
Giant Molecular Clouds in M33. II. High‐Resolution Observations
Rosolowsky, E., Engargiola, G., Plambeck, R. L., & Blitz, L. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/379166 · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Cited by
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Schruba, A., Hygate, A. P. S., Hu, C.-Y., Haydon, D. T., & Longmore, S. N. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1128 · Cited by 103
DISTRIBUTION AND MASS OF DIFFUSE AND DENSE CO GAS IN THE MILKY WAY
Roman-Duval, J., Heyer, M., Brunt, C. M., Clark, P., Klessen, R., & Shetty, R. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/144 · Cited by 92
The Circumnuclear Disk Revealed by ALMA. I. Dense Clouds and Tides in the Galactic Center
Hsieh, P.-Y., Koch, P. M., Kim, W.-T., Martín, S., Yen, H.-W., Carpenter, J. M., Harada, N., Turner, J. L., Ho, P. T. P., Tang, Y.-W., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf4cd · Cited by 40
“We use a bootstrap approach to calculate the uncertainties in the derived properties (Rosolowsky & Leroy 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 842
- Pages
- 590-610
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W2088704657
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/502982
- The paper
- Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A. (2006). Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/502982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.