Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties

Open access
Rosolowsky, Erik, Leroy, Adam·2006·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

We review methods for measuring the sizes, line widths, and luminosities of giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in molecular‐line data cubes with low resolution and sensitivity. We find that moment methods are robust and sensitive, making full use of both position and intensity information, and we recommend a standard method to measure the position angle, major and minor axis sizes, line width, and luminosity using moment methods. Without corrections for the effects of beam convolution and sensitivity to GMC properties, the resulting properties may be severely biased. This is particularly true for extragalactic observations, where resolution and sensitivity effects often bias measured values by 40% or more. We correct for finite spatial and spectral resolutions with a simple deconvolution, and we correct for sensitivity biases by extrapolating properties of a GMC to those we would expect to measure with perfect sensitivity (i.e., the 0 K isosurface). The resulting method recovers the properties of a GMC to within 10% over a large range of resolutions and sensitivities, provided the clouds are marginally resolved with a peak signal‐to‐noise ratio greater than 10. We note that interferometers systematically underestimate cloud properties, particularly the flux from a cloud. The degree of bias depends on the sensitivity of the observations and the (u,v) coverage of the observations. In an Appendix to the paper we present a conservative, new decomposition algorithm for identifying GMCs in molecular‐line observations. This algorithm treats the data in physical rather than observational units (i.e., parsecs rather than beams or arcseconds), does not produce spurious clouds in the presence of noise, and is sensitive to a range of morphologies. As a result, the output of this decomposition should be directly comparable among disparate data sets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/502982

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2006-04
Volume
118
Issue
842
Pages
590-610
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2088704657
Cited by
334
References
14
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/502982
The paper
Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A. (2006). Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/502982

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.