The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brightest cluster galaxies as standard candles
Abstract
We investigate the use of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) as standard candles for measuring galaxy peculiar velocities on large scales. We have obtained precise large-format CCD surface photometry and redshifts for an all-sky, volume-limited (z <= 0.05) sample of 119 BCG. We reinvestigate the Hoessel (1980) relationship between the metric luminosity, L_m_, within the central 10 h^-1^ kpc of the BCGs and the logarithmic slope of the surface brightness profile, α. The L_m_-α relationship reduces the cosmic scatter in L_m_ from 0.327 mag to 0.244 mag, yielding a typical distance accuracy of 17% per BCG. Residuals about the L_m_-α relationship are independent of BCG luminosity, BCG B - R_c_ color, BCG location within the host cluster, and richness of the host cluster. The metric luminosity is independent of cluster richness even before correcting for its dependence on α, which provides further evidence for the unique nature of the BCG luminosity function. Indeed, the BCG luminosity function, both before and after application of the α-correction, is consistent with a single Gaussian distribution. Half the BCGs in the sample show some evidence of small color gradients as a function of radius within their central 50 h^- 1^ kpc regions but with almost equal numbers becoming redder as becoming bluer. However, with the central 10 h^-1^ kpc the colors are remarkably constant-the mean B - R_c_ color is 1.51 with a dispersion of only 0.06 mag. The narrow photometric and color distributions of the BCGs, the lack of "second-parameter" effects, as well as the unique rich cluster environment of BCGs, argue that BCGs are the most homogeneous distance indicators presently available for large-scale structure research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Early Data Release
Stoughton, C., Lupton, R. H., Bernardi, M., Blanton, M. R., Burles, S., Castander, F. J., Connolly, A. J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., Hennessy, G. S., et al. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/324741 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citationTHE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER
Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/198 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationThe ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray (REFLEX) Galaxy cluster survey: V. The cluster catalogue
Böhringer, H., Schuecker, P., Guzzo, L., Collins, C. A., Voges, W., Cruddace, R. G., Ortiz-Gil, A., Chincarini, G., De Grandi, S., Edge, A. C., et al. (2004) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034484 · Cited by 649
The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies
Strauss, M. A., & Willick, J. A. (1995) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00013-7 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Postman, M., & Lauer, T. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 440
- Pages
- 28
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1963837031
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brightest cluster galaxies as standard candles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/175245
- The paper
- Postman, M., & Lauer, T. R. (1995). Brightest cluster galaxies as standard candles. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/175245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.