The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantifying the Fragility of Galactic Disks in Minor Mergers
Open accessAbstract
We perform fully self-consistent stellar dynamical simulations of the accretion of a companion ("satellite") galaxy by a large disk galaxy to investigate the interaction between the disk, halo, and satellite components of the system during a merger. Our fiducial encounter begins with a satellite in a prograde, circular orbit inclined 30^deg^ with respect to the disk plane at a galactocentric distance of 6 disk scale lengths. The satellite's mass is 10% of the disk's mass, and its half- mass radius is ~1.3 kpc. The system is modeled with 500,000 particles, which is sufficient to mitigate numerical relaxation noise over the merging time. The satellite sinks in only ~1 Gyr and a core containing 45% of its initial mass reaches the center of the disk. With so much of the satellite's mass remaining intact, the disk sustains significant damage as the satellite passes through. At the solar circle we find that the disk thickens 60%, the velocity dispersions increase by {DELTA}σ ~ (10,8,8) km s^-1^ to (σ_R_, σphi_, σ_z_) ~ (48,42,38) km s^-1^, and the asymmetric drift is unchanged at ~18 km s^-1^. Although the disk is not destroyed by these events (hence "minor" mergers), its final state resembles a disk galaxy of an earlier Hubble type than its initial state-thicker and hotter, with the satellite's core enhancing the bulge. Thus minor mergers continue to be a promising mechanism for driving galaxy evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952
The New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 · Cited by 1,160
Carollo, D., Beers, T. C., Chiba, M., Norris, J. E., Freeman, K. C., Lee, Y. S., Ivezić, Ž., Rockosi, C. M., & Yanny, B. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/692 · Cited by 494
Space Velocities of Globular Clusters. III. Cluster Orbits and Halo Substructure
Dinescu, D. I., Girard, T. M., & van Altena, W. F. (1999) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300807 · Cited by 462
Simulations of minor mergers - I. General properties of thick discs
Villalobos, Á., & Helmi, A. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13979.x · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, I. R., Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 460
- Pages
- 121
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2077334492
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Fragility of Galactic Disks in Minor Mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/176956
- The paper
- Walker, I. R., Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. (1996). Quantifying the Fragility of Galactic Disks in Minor Mergers. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/176956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.