Cited by 1,160Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation

Open access
Freeman, Ken, Bland-Hawthorn, Joss·2002·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

▪ Abstract The formation and evolution of galaxies is one of the great outstanding problems of astrophysics. Within the broad context of hierachical structure formation, we have only a crude picture of how galaxies like our own came into existence. A detailed physical picture where individual stellar populations can be associated with (tagged to) elements of the protocloud is far beyond our current understanding. Important clues have begun to emerge from both the Galaxy (near-field cosmology) and the high redshift universe (far-field cosmology). Here we focus on the fossil evidence provided by the Galaxy. Detailed studies of the Galaxy lie at the core of understanding the complex processes involved in baryon dissipation. This is a necessary first step toward achieving a successful theory of galaxy formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Future surveys and instruments will require accurate stellar yields from stars in all mass ranges in order to disentangle Galactic substructure revealed through chemical tagging.

    “Future surveys and instruments (e.g., the GAIA-ESO survey, HERMES on the AAT, APOGEE, LAMOST) will also require accurate stellar yields from stars in all mass ranges in order to disentangle the Galactic substructure revealed through chemical tagging (Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2002).”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2002

    Sections 5.2–5.3 describe using chemical signatures to unravel Galactic formation and tag stars to common birth sites. Section 5.7 calls for improved supernova models and discusses yields from progenitors of different masses, while the Epilogue calls for new instruments. The paper does not say that the named surveys require accurate stellar yields from stars in all mass ranges to disentangle substructure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [5]Arnould M, Goriely S. 2001. In Astrophysical Ages and Time Scales , eds T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:252-261 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  2. [19]Bland-Hawthorn J, Maloney, PR 2001, In Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift , eds. J. Mulchaey & J. Stocke, ASP Conf. Ser. 254:267-82 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  3. [20]Bland-Hawthorn J. 2002. In The Dynamics, Structure and History of Galaxies ed. G. Da Costa, H. Jerjen, ASP Conf. Ser. 273:155-66 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  4. [36]Carney BW. 1993. In The Globular Cluster -Galaxy Connection eds. GH Smith & JP Brodie, ASP Conf. Ser. 48:234-45 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  5. [50]Christensen-Dalsgaard J. 1986. Proc. IAU Symp. 123, 295-
  6. [52]Cianci S. 2002. PhD thesis , University of Sydney
  7. [53]Clarke CJ, Bonnell IA, Hillenbrand LA. 2000. In Protostars and Planets IV , eds V Mannings, AP Boss, SS Russell, pp 151-177 (Arizona: Univ of Arizona Press)
  8. [64]Da Costa G, 1999. In The Third Stromlo Symposium: The Galactic Halo eds. B Gibson, T Axelrod, M Putman, ASP Conf. Ser. 165:153-166 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  9. [83]Elmegreen BG, Efremov Y, Pudritz RE, Zinnecker H. 2000. In Protostars and Planets IV , eds V Mannings, AP Boss, SS Russell, pp 179-215 (Arizona: Univ of Arizona Press)
  10. [97]Freeman, KC. 1993. In The Globular Cluster -Galaxy Connection eds. GH Smith & JP Brodie, ASP Conf. Ser. 48:608-14 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  11. [105]Gimenez, A, Favata, F. 2001. In Astrophysical Ages & Time Scales eds. T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:304-306
  12. [112]Gough DO. 2001. In Astrophysical Ages & Time Scales eds. T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:31-43
  13. [127]Helmi A, Zhao H-S, de Zeeuw PT. 1999. In The Third Stromlo Symposium: The Galactic Halo , eds. BK Gibson, TS Axelrod, ME Putman, ASP Conf. Ser. 165:125-29. (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  14. [148]Ishimaru Y, Wanajo S. 2000 In The First Stars ed A Weiss, TG Abel, V Hill, p 189-193 (Berlin: Springer) 149. Jablonka P, Martin P, Arimoto N. 1996. Astron.J. 112:1415-22 150. Janes KA, Phelps RL. 1994. Astron.J. 108:1773-85 151. Jenkins A, Binney J. 1990. MNRAS 245:305-17 152. Jenkins A, Frenk CS, White SDM, Colberg JM, Cole S, et al. 2001. MNRAS 321:372-84 153. Johnson JA, Bolte M. 2001. Ap.J. 554:888-902 154. Johnston KV. 1998. Ap.J. 495:297-308 155. Johnston KV, Sackett PD, Bullock JS. 2001. Ap.J. 557:137-149 156. Johnston KV, Hernquist L, Bolte M. 1996. Ap.J. 465:278-287 157. Johnston KV, Spergel DN, Haydn C. 2002. Ap.J. 570:656-64 158. Jones L, Worthey G. 1995, Ap.J. 446:L31-L35 159. Jones L, Smail I, Couch W. 2000. Ap.J. 528:118-122 160. Just A. 2001. In Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Perturbations , ed E Athanassoula, A Bosma, I Puerari, in press. (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific) 161. Kamionkowski M, Liddle AR. 2000. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:4525-8 162. K¨ appeler F, Thielemann FK & Wiescher M. 1998. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48:175-251 163. Karlsson T, Gustafsson B. 2001. Astron.Astrophys. 379:461-81 164. Kauffmann G, White SDM, Guiderdoni B. 1993. MNRAS 264:201-18 165. Kauffmann G. 1996. MNRAS 281:487-492 166. Kauffmann G, Charlot, S. 1998. MNRAS 294:705-17 167. King IR. 1958 a . Astron.J. 63:109-13 168. King IR. 1958 b . Astron.J. 63:114-17 169. King IR. 1958 c . Astron.J. 63:465-73 170. Kinman TD. 1959 MNRAS 119:538-58 171. Klypin A, Kravtsov AV, Valenzuela O, Prada F. 1999. Ap.J. 522:82-92 172. Kochanek C. 1996. Ap.J. 457:228-43 173. Kroupa P. 2002. MNRAS 330:707-18 174. Kuntschner J. & Davies RL. 1998. MNRAS 295:L29-L33 175. Kuntschner H. 2000. MNRAS 315:184-208 176. Kurucz RL. 1991. In The Solar Interior and Atmosphere eds. AN Cox, WC Livingston, M Matthews. p 663 (Tucson: U. Arizona Press) 177. Kurucz RL. 1995. In Laboratory and Astronomical High Resolution Spectra eds. AJ Sauval, R Blomme, N Grevesse p 17 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific) 178. Lacey C, Fall M. 1983. MNRAS 204:791-810 179. Lacey C, Fall M. 1985. Ap.J. 290:154-70 180. Larson R. 1974. MNRAS 169:229-246 181. Lee Y-W, Joo J-M, Sohn Y-J, Rey S-C, Lee H-C, Walker AR. 1999. Nature 402:55-57 182. Lewis GF, Bland-Hawthorn J, Gibson BK, Putman ME. 2000. PASP. 112:1300-04 183. Lin D, Pringle J. 1987. Ap.J. 320:L87-91 184. Lineweaver, CH. 1999. Science 284:1503-1507 185. Liu W, Chaboyer B. 2000. Ap.J. 544:818-29 186. Luck RE, Bond HE. 1985. Ap.J. 292:559-77 187. Lynden-Bell D, Lynden-Bell RM. 1995. MNRAS 275:429-42 188. Lynden-Bell D, Kalnajs A. 1972. MNRAS 157:1-30 189. Mac Low M, Ferrara A. 1999. Ap.J. 513:142-55 190. Majewski SR. 1993. Annu.Rev.Astron.Astrophys. 31:575-638 191. Majewski SR, Hawley SL, Munn JA. 1996. In Formation of the Halo ...Inside & Out eds. H Morrison, A Sarajedini, ASP Conf.Ser. 92:119-129. (San Francisco:Astron.Soc.Pacific) 192. Majewski SR, Ostheimer JC, Kunkel WE, Patterson RJ. 2000. Astron.J. 120:2550-68 193. Malin DF, Carter D. 1980. Nature 285:643-45 194. Malin DF, Hadley B. 1997. Proc.Astron.Soc.Austr 14:52-58 195. Maloney P. 1993. Ap.J. 414:41-56 196. Manuel O. 2000. Origins of Elements in the Solar System , (Kluwer: NewYork) 197. Marquez A, Schuster WJ. 1994. Astron.Astrophys.Suppl. 108:341-58 198. Mateo M. 1998. Annu.Rev.Astron.Astrophys. 36:435-506 199. Mathews GJ, Bazan G, Cowan JJ. 1992. Ap.J. 391:719-735 200. Matteucci F, Francois P. 1989. MNRAS 239:885-904 ```
  15. [213]Mushotzky R. 1999. In The Hy-Redshift Universe, eds. AJ Bunker & WJM van Breugel, Conf. Ser. 193:323-335 (San Francisco: ASP)
  16. [221]Oort J. 1965. In Galactic Structure eds. A. Blaauw, M. Schmidt (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press) p. 455-511
  17. [226]Pagel BEJ. 1989. In Evolutionary Phenomena in Galaxies (Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge) p 201-23
  18. [230]Peebles PJE. 1971. Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press: Princeton)
  19. [240]Press WH, Schecter P. 1974. Ap.J. 187:425-438
  20. [244]Quillen AC, Garnett, D. 2001. In Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies, eds. G Jose, SJ Funes and EM Corsini, ASP Conf.Ser. 230:87-88 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  21. [253]Renzini A. 2000. In From Extrasolar Planets to Cosmology ed J Bergeron, A Renzini, p 168 (Berlin: Springer)
  22. [254]Renzini A. 2001. In Chemical Enrichment of Intracluster and Intergalactic Medium ed F Matteucci and R Fusco-Femiano, ASP. Conf. Ser. (San Francisco: ASP)
  23. [255]Rich, RM. 2001. In Astrophysical Ages and Time Scales , eds T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:216-25 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  24. [260]Rutherford, E. 1904. Radiation and emanation of radium, in The Collected Works of Lord Rutherford - Vol. 1. Allen & Unwin, London, 1962-1965
  25. [268]Schweizer F. 1987. In Nearly Normal Galaxies: From the Planck Time to the Present ed S Faber, p. 18-25 (New York, Springer-Verlag)
  26. [271]Sedgewick R. 1992. Algorithms in C ++ (Addison-Wesley)
  27. [273]Sellwood JA. 2001. In Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Perturbations ed E Athanassoula, A Bosma & I. Puerari, (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific) in press
  28. [274]Sellwood JA, Kosowsky A. 2002. In The Dynamics, Structure and History of Galaxies ed. G. Da Costa, H. Jerjen, ASP Conf. Ser. 273:243-53 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  29. [279]Sneden C, Cowan JJ, Beers TC, Truran JW, Lawler JE, Fuller G. 2001 a . In Astrophysical Ages and Time Scales , eds T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:235243 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  30. [284]Stahler SW, Palla F, Ho PTP. 2000. In Protostars and Planets IV , eds V Mannings, AP Boss, SS Russell, pp 327-351 (Arizona: Univ of Arizona Press)
  31. [298]Truran JW, Burles S, Cowan J, Sneden C. 2001. In Astrophysical Ages and Time Scales , eds T von Hippel, C Simpson & N Manset, ASP Conf. Ser. 245:226-34 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  32. [310]van den Bergh S. 2000. The Galaxies of the Local Group (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  33. [311]van der Kruit P. 2002. In The Dynamics, Structure and History of Galaxies ed. G. Da Costa, H. Jerjen, ASP Conf. Ser. 273:7-18 (San Francisco: Astron.Soc.Pacific)
  34. [319]Weiner BJ, Vogel SN, Williams TB. 2001. In Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift , eds. J. Mulchaey & J. Stocke, ASP Conf. Ser. 254:256-66 (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.)
  35. [324]White SDM. 1996. In Cosmology & Large Scale Structure ed R Schaeffer, J Silk, M Spiro, J Zinn-Justin p 349 (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
  36. The philosophy behind this review has emerged from discussions dating back to the spring of 1988 when KCF and JBH were visiting the Institute of Advanced Study at Princeton. At that time, there was a quorum of galaxy dynamicists at the IAS whose work continues to inspire and excite us. Our thanks go to John Bahcall for this opportunity. We thank Michael Perryman and the Gaia team for the inspiration of the Gaia science mission. We have greatly benefitted from excellent reviews by E. Friel, J. Sellwood, and G. Wallerstein and collaborators. Most recent, we acknowledge the inspiration of colleagues at the 2001 Dunk Island conference, in particular, Tim de Zeeuw, Mike Fall, Ivan King, John Kormendy, John Norris, Jerry Sellwood, Pieter van der Kruit and Ewine van Dishoeck. We have benefited from discussions with Vladimir Avila-Reese, Rainer Beck, Bob Kurucz, Ruth Peterson, Tomek Plewa and Jason Prochaska. We are indebted to Allan Sandage for many constructive comments. Finally, we thank the Editor for suggesting the main title 'New Galaxy' for this review.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Anglo-Australian Observatory, 167 Vimiera Road, Eastwood, NSW 2122, Australia;
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2002-09
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
487-537
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2109138120
Cited by
1,160
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 47
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Milky Way formation, hierarchical structure formation, stellar populations, high-redshift universe, galaxy evolution, near-field cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review