Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Galaxy Cluster Virial Masses and Omega

Open access
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., Ellingson, E., Abraham, R., Gravel, P., Morris, S., Pritchet, C. J.·1996·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The mean density of the universe is equal to the mass of a large galaxy cluster divided by the equivalent comoving volume in the field from which that mass originated. To reexamine the rich cluster {OMEGA}- value the CNOC Cluster Survey has observed 16 high X-ray luminosity clusters in the redshift range 0.17-0.55, obtaining approximately 2600 velocities in their fields. The systemic redshift, the rms line-of-sight velocity dispersion σ_1_, and the mean harmonic radius rnu_ are derived for each cluster using algorithms that correct for interlopers in redshift space and measure the angular extent of the sampling. The virial mass, and its internal error, are derived from σ_1_ and rnu_. The cluster luminosity is estimated from the K-corrected r-band luminosities of the cluster galaxies. Directly adding all the light to M_r_^K^ = - 18.5 mag, about 0.2L_sun_, and extrapolating for the small amount of light below the limit, the average mass-to-light ratio of the clusters is 295 +/- 53 h M_sun_ L_sun_^-1^, and the average mass per galaxy to M_r_^K^ = - 19.0 mag is 4.2 +/- 1.1 x 10^12^ h^-1^ M_sun_. The clusters are consistent with having a universal Mnu_/L-value (within the errors of about 25%) independent of their velocity dispersion, mean color of their galaxies, blue galaxy content, redshift, or mean interior density. Using field galaxies within the same data set, with the same corrections, we find that the closure mass-to-light ratio, ρ_c_/j, is 1025 +/- 140 h M_sun_ L_sun_^-1^, and the closure mass per galaxy to M_r_^K^ = - 19.0 mag, ρ_c_/{PHI} is 15.5 +/- 3.0 x 10^12^ h^-1^ M_sun_. Under the assumptions that the galaxies are distributed like the mass and that the galaxy luminosities and numbers are statistically conserved, assumptions that these data indirectly support, {OMEGA}_0_ = 0.24 +/- 0.05 +/- 0.09, where the errors are, respectively, the 1 σ random error and an estimate of the possible systematic error resulting from the normalization to galaxy content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/177125

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., Ellingson, E., Abraham, R., Gravel, P., Morris, S., & Pritchet, C. J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1996-05
Volume
462
Pages
32
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2057291499
Cited by
458
References
0
FWCI
37.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galaxy Cluster Virial Masses and Omega. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177125
The paper
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., Ellingson, E., Abraham, R., Gravel, P., Morris, S., & Pritchet, C. J. (1996). Galaxy Cluster Virial Masses and Omega. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.