Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Weak Gravitational Lensing by Galaxies

Open access
Brainerd, Tereasa G., Blandford, Roger D., Smail, Ian·1996·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report a detection of weak, tangential distortion of the images of cosmologically distant, faint galaxies due to gravitational lensing by foreground galaxies. A mean image polarization of (p)= 0.011 +/- 0.006 (95% confidence bounds) is obtained for 3202 pairs of source (23 < r_s_ <24) and lens (20 (20 <= r_d_ <= 23) galaxies with projected separations of 5" <= θ <= 34". Averaged over annuli of inner radIus 5" and outer radius θ_max_, the signal is string for lens-source separations of θ_max_ <~ 90" consistent with quas-isothermal galaxy halos extending to large radii (~>100 h^-1^ kpc). The observed polarization is also consistent with the signal expected on the basis of simulations incorporating measured properties of local galaxies and modest extrapolations of the observed redshift distribution of faint galaxies (to which the results are somewhat sensitive). From the simulations we obtain formal best-fit model parameters for the dark halos of the lens galaxies that consist of a characteristic circular velocity of V^*^ ~220 +/- 80 km s^-1^ and characteristic radial extent of s^*^ ~> 100 h^-1^ kpc. The predicted polarization based on the model is relatively insensitive to the characteristic radial extent of the halos, s^*^, and very small halos (s^*^ ~ 10 h^-1^ kpc) are excluded only at the 2 a level. The formal best-fit halo parameters imply typical masses for the lens galaxies within a radius of 100 h^-1^ kpc on the order of 1.0_-0.5_^+1.2^ x 10^12^ h^-1^ M_sun_ (90% confidence bounds), in agreement with recent dynamical estimates of the masses of local spiral galaxies. This is particularly encouraging as the lensing and dynamical mass estimators rely on different sets of assumptions. Contamination of the gravitational lensing signal by a population of tidally distorted satellite galaxies can be ruled out with reasonable confidence. The prospects for corroborating and improving this measurement seem good, especially using deep HST archival data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/177537

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 435

Metadata

Authors
Brainerd, T. G., Blandford, R. D., & Smail, I.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1996-08
Volume
466
Pages
623
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3124916785
Cited by
435
References
0
FWCI
16.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak Gravitational Lensing by Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177537
The paper
Brainerd, T. G., Blandford, R. D., & Smail, I. (1996). Weak Gravitational Lensing by Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.