The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spectroscopy of New Substellar Candidates in the Pleiades: Toward a Spectral Sequence for Young Brown Dwarfs
Open accessAbstract
We present optical and near-infrared spectroscopy (600-1000 nm) of eight faint (I > 18) very red (R - I > 2.2) objects discovered in a recent deep CCD survey of the Pleiades cluster by ZapateroOsorio, Rebolo, & Martin. We compare them with reliable cluster members like PP1 15 and Teide 1, and with several field very late type dwarfs (M4-M9.5), which were observed with similar instrumental configurations. Using pseudocontinuum ratios, we classify the new substellar candidates in a spectral sequence defined with reference to field stars of known spectral types. We also reclassify PP1 15 and Teide 1 in a self- consistent way. The likelihood of membership for the new candidates is assessed via the study of their photospheric features, Ha emission, radial velocity, and consistency of their spectral types and I-band magnitudes with known cluster members. Four of the new substellar candidates are as late or later than PP1 15 (M6.5), but only one, namely, Calar 3 (M8), clearly meets all our membership criteria. It is indeed an object very similar to the brown dwarf Teide 1. Out of the eight new substellar candidates, our "cautious" membership analysis leaves only Calar 3 as a Pleiades brown dwarf with a high level of confidence. This object, together with Teide 1, allows one to compare the spectroscopic characteristics of Pleiades brown dwarfs with those of old very cool dwarfs. The overall spectral properties are similar, but there are slight differences in the NaI doublet (818.3 nm, 819.5 nm), VO molecular band (740 nm), and some spectral ratios, which are probably related to lower surface gravity in the young Pleiades brown dwarfs than in field stars. Finally, we propose a way of improving future CCD-based brown dwarf surveys by using narrowband near-IR pseudocontinuum filters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Limiting Effects of Dust in Brown Dwarf Model Atmospheres
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321547 · Cited by 1,062
The theory of brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets
Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719 · Cited by 819
Evolutionary models for low-mass stars and brown dwarfs: Uncertainties and limits at very young ages
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. (2002) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 · Cited by 656
Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134017 · Cited by 560
New Neighbors from 2MASS: Activity and Kinematics at the Bottom of the Main Sequence
Gizis, J. E., Monet, D. G., Reid, I. N., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Liebert, J., & Williams, R. J. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301456 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, E. L., Rebolo, R., & Zapatero-Osorio, M. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 469
- Pages
- 706
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2091750156
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectroscopy of New Substellar Candidates in the Pleiades: Toward a Spectral Sequence for Young Brown Dwarfs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177817
- The paper
- Martin, E. L., Rebolo, R., & Zapatero-Osorio, M. R. (1996). Spectroscopy of New Substellar Candidates in the Pleiades: Toward a Spectral Sequence for Young Brown Dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.