The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extremely Metal‐poor Stars. II. Elemental Abundances and the Early Chemical Enrichment of the Galaxy
Open accessAbstract
We have obtained high-resolution spectra of 23 very metal-poor stars and present an abundance analysis for 19 of these for elements between Mg and Eu. The sample comprises roughly equal numbers of dwarfs and giants. All stars have [Fe/H] < −2.5, and 10 have [Fe/H] < −3.0. In addition, for six stars with [Fe/H] < −3.0, we compile equivalent widths from the literature (including our own studies) and recompute abundances. Possible errors in the stellar atmospheric models are discussed in detail. Hyperfine-structure corrections are presented for Mn and Co. We use robust techniques to delineate the main trends in the [X/Fe] versus [Fe/H] plots and compare these with the Galactic chemical evolution computations of Timmes, Woosley, & Weaver. The main results are as follows: The lowest abundance we derive for a previously unobserved star is [Fe/H] = −3.57, for CS 22172–002. There are now six stars with [Fe/H] < −3.50 as determined from high-resolution analyses. The α-elements Mg, Si, Ca, and Ti possess almost uniform overabundances (relative to iron) down to at least [Fe/H] = −4, the current limit of observations. [Mg/Fe] increases slightly at [Fe/H] < −2.5, but the slope is only −0.15 dex dex −1 and may be due to systematic errors. Ti behaves like the other α-elements, contrary to stellar nucleosynthetic calculations. Stars with [Fe/H] < −2.5 reach a plateau in [Al/Fe] ≃ −0.8 that extends at least down to [Fe/H] = − 4, but Baumueller & Gehren have advised of the need for +0.5 dex non-LTE corrections in the dwarfs, leading to a revised plateau nearer [Al/Fe] ≃ −0.3. This level is qualitatively consistent with an odd-even effect for Mg and Al, and in quantitative agreement with Timmes et al.'s Galactic chemical evolution model. We confirm the underabundance of [Cr/Fe] and [Mn/Fe], and the overabundance of [Co/Fe], in stars with [Fe/H] < −2.5 that was highlighted by McWilliam et al. In addition, we point to a mild overabundance in [Ni/Fe], though this may be dominated by a few stars that have higher than normal [Ni/Fe] but that do not reflect an overall trend. Like CS 22949–037, discussed by McWilliam et al., CS 22876–032 shows real variations in yields, with Al and Mg produced in their normal ratios to one another but with underabundances in [Si/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and possibly [Sc/Fe]. It is clear from several elements that real star-to-star abundance differences are common at the lowest metallicities. Sr is measured in most of our stars, but Y and Ba are generally strong enough only in the giants. [Sr/Fe] shows a spread greater than 2 dex (i.e., by a factor in excess of 100) at [Fe/H] < −3, greatly exceeding reasonable errors in the measurement. This spread exists for both dwarfs and giants. [Ba/Fe] decreases as [Fe/H] falls below −2.0, and it exhibits less scatter than [Sr/Fe]. A small number of stars with [Ba/Fe] > 0 deserve further study. CS 22897–008 has high Sr, Y, and C abundances for its [Fe/H] but normal Ba. This signature may have arisen from the weak s-process in M > 15 M ☉ stars or by r- processing. By combining an analytic description of gaseous supernova remnants with supernova yields, we show that enrichment of the interstellar medium is influenced more by supernova physics (explosive energy) than by environmental conditions (cloud density). If supernova iron-peak yields are correlated with explosion energy, we can accommodate the well-defined abundance trends with a chaotic picture for halo formation involving independently evolving clouds, as was envisaged by Searle & Zinn. We calculate that a typical enrichment in the protohalo will produce [Fe/H] = −2.7. This coincides with larger abundance variations in field stars of lower metallicity and the lower abundance limit for Galactic globular clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Discovery and Analysis of Very Metal-Poor Stars in the Galaxy
Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citationThe New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 · Cited by 1,160
Neutron-Capture Elements in the Early Galaxy
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207 · Cited by 968
Abundance Variations within Globular Clusters
Gratton, R., Sneden, C., & Carretta, E. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133945 · Cited by 885
Nucleosynthesis yields of core-collapse supernovae and hypernovae, and galactic chemical evolution
Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., Umeda, H., Kobayashi, C., & Maeda, K. (2006) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., & Beers, T. C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 471
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 254-278
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2071615312
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extremely Metal‐poor Stars. II. Elemental Abundances and the Early Chemical Enrichment of the Galaxy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177967
- The paper
- Ryan, S. G., Norris, J. E., & Beers, T. C. (1996). Extremely Metal‐poor Stars. II. Elemental Abundances and the Early Chemical Enrichment of the Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.