Cited by 121

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complicities and Collaborations: Anthropologists and the “Unacknowledged Tribes” of California

Field, Les W.·1999·Current Anthropology

Abstract

California's statehood and assimilation into the United States during the 19th century were accompanied by genocide against the indigenous population; among those peoples that survived, a large number were officially erased by a federal policy of non‐recognition in which anthropologists and anthropological knowledge played a role. At the end of the 20th century the descendants of these peoples, the “unacknowledged tribes,” are engaged in struggles both to gain federal recognition and to revive their languages and cultural heritage, processes in which anthropologists once again are involved. This paper explores the relationships between the unacknowledged tribes and anthropologists in both eras, focusing upon the mixture of essentialist and constructionist approaches to indigenous identity which underlies contemporary collaborations between indigenous intellectuals and leaders and anthropologist interlocutors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/200004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area is the sovereign nation whose territory encompasses the land where UC Berkeley is located.

    “One such community is the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, which is the sovereign nation whose territory encompasses the land where UC Berkeley is located (Field 1999;Leventhal et al. 1994).”

    From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Field 1999

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Department of Anthropology, 1998, University of New Mexico
  2. Barth The, 1969, See
  3. Jenkins, 1997, for an overview of Barthian and post-Barthian approaches to ethnicity
  4. Zimmerman Biolsi, 1997, for a retrospective response to Deloria's challenges
  5. Zimmerman Biolsi, 1997, argue that the micropolitics of the academy militate against such collaborative/advocacy work, pointing out that anthropologists who set out on this road create a ``double-day'' for themselves
  6. abu-lughod, lila. 1991. ``Writing against culture,'' in Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present. Edited byR. Fox, pp.137-162. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  7. 1980, walter l
  8. 1994, tomás
  9. 1991, benedict
  10. 1996, paul
  11. 1973, talal. Editor
  12. 1996, Working paper on previous acknowledgment in California
  13. 1969, fredrik
  14. Cherokee My, 1998, `blood'' essentialisms in shaping the specific legal and political discourse of Cherokee national citizenship (see Sturm
  15. 1994, lowell john. Editor
  16. 1978, robert f., jr
  17. 1997, Indians and anthropology: Vine Deloria Jr. and the critique of anthropology
  18. 1985, paul
  19. bruner, edward m. 1983. ``Ethnography as narrative,'' in The anthropology of experience. Edited byVictor Turner and Edward M. Bruner, pp.139-155. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [tb]
  20. 1991, jack
  21. carrico, richard l., and florence c. shipek. 1996. ``Indian labor in San Diego County,California, 1850-1900,'' in Native Americans and wage labor: Ethnohistorical perspectives. Edited byA. Littlefield and M. C. Knack, pp.198-217. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  22. castillo, edward d. 1978a. ``The impact of Euro-American exploration and settlement,'' in Handbook of North American Indians, vol.8, California. Edited byRobert F. Heizer, pp.99-127. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  23. castillo ``Twentieth-century secular movements,'' in Handbook of North American Indians, vol.8, California. Edited byRobert F. Heizer, pp.713-717. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  24. castillo ``The native response to the colonization of Alta California,'' in Columbian consequences, vol.1. Edited byDavid Hurst Thomas, pp.377-394. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  25. 1988, james
  26. 1998, james
  27. 1976, sherburne f
  28. 1969, vine, jr
  29. deloria ``The evolution of federal Indian policy making,'' in American Indian policy in the twentieth century. Edited by Vine Deloria Jr., pp.239-256. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  30. 1927, lafayette a
  31. 1907, Letter to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. June 23. California Consolidated Files
  32. 1983, johannes
  33. 10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962555 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/25158653 · DOI
  35. 1982, jack d
  36. foucault, michel. 1980. ``Truth and power,'' in Power/ knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Edited byC. Gordon, pp.109-133. New York: Pantheon Books.
  37. 1994, jonathan
  38. 1989, diana
  39. ía, 1995, nestor
  40. 1970, alvin w
  41. 1971, antonio
  42. 1997, brian d., and larry r. wilcoxon
  43. 1972, robert f. Editor
  44. 1851, They were only diggers: A collection of articles from California newspapers
  45. heizer ``Treaties,'' in Handbook of North American Indians, vol.8, California. Edited byRobert Heizer, pp.701-704. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  46. 1853, Federal concern about conditions of California Indians
  47. 1983, e. j., and t. o. ranger
  48. 2nd Session
  49. 1988, albert
  50. 1969, dell. Editor
  51. 1994, robert h
  52. 1995, robert h., and edward castillo
  53. 1996, thomas l
  54. 1997, richard
  55. 1996, troy r
  56. 1996, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 20, 233
  57. 1997, troy r., joane nagel, and duane champagne. Editors
  58. 1903, charles e
  59. 1907, Letter to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. July 25 California Consolidated Files
  60. 1925, alfred l
  61. 1970, alfred l., and robert f. heizer
  62. 1955, University of California Archaeological Research Facility Contribution, 9, 1
  63. 1982, robert g., jr
  64. 1992, julian
  65. lavie, smadar, and ted swedenburg. 1996. ``Introduction: Displacement, diaspora, and geographies of identity,'' in Displacement, diaspora, and geographies of identity. Edited by S. Lavie and T. Swedenburg, pp.1-25. Durham and London:Duke University Press. · DOI
  66. 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 61, 201
  67. leventhal, alan, les field, hank alvarez, and rosemary cambra. 1994. ``TheOhlone: Back from extinction,'' in The Ohlone past and present: Native Americans of the San Francisco Bay Region. Edited by L. J. Bean, pp.297-336. Menlo Park, Calif.Ballena Press.
  68. 1992, claudio
  69. 1984, audre
  70. 1995, florencia e
  71. 1986, george, and michael fisher
  72. 1927, e. b
  73. 1939, GSA 310/1927
  74. 1995, randall
  75. 1810, Calif.: Ballena Press.
  76. 1990, douglas
  77. 10.1525/aa.1993.95.3.02a00070 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 1978, byron, jr
  79. 1979, jack
  80. 1997, george harwood
  81. 1984, james j
  82. 1993, edward w
  83. 1991, Genders, 10, 1
  84. sarris, greg. 1996. ``Living with miracles: The politics and poetics of writing American Indian resistance and identity,'' in Displacements, diasporas, and geographies of identity. Edited by S. Lavie and T. Swedenburg, pp.27-40. Durham and London:Duke University Press. · DOI
  85. 1993, gerald
  86. 1986, william s
  87. 1989, American Indian Quarterly, 325
  88. stewart, omer c. 1978. ``Litigation and its effects,'' in Handbook of North American Indians, vol.8, California. Edited byRobert F. Heizer, pp.705-712. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  89. 1992, george w., jr. Editor
  90. 1998, American Indian Quarterly, 22, 230
  91. 1992, david
  92. 1958, raymond

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Field, L. W.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1999-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
193-210
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
Cited by
121
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review