Cited by 246Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning Development

Prestige Affects Cultural Learning in Chimpanzees

Open access
Horner, Victoria, Proctor, Darby, Bonnie, Kristin E., Whiten, Andrew, de Waal, Frans B. M.·2010·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Humans follow the example of prestigious, high-status individuals much more readily than that of others, such as when we copy the behavior of village elders, community leaders, or celebrities. This tendency has been declared uniquely human, yet remains untested in other species. Experimental studies of animal learning have typically focused on the learning mechanism rather than on social issues, such as who learns from whom. The latter, however, is essential to understanding how habits spread. Here we report that when given opportunities to watch alternative solutions to a foraging problem performed by two different models of their own species, chimpanzees preferentially copy the method shown by the older, higher-ranking individual with a prior track-record of success. Since both solutions were equally difficult, shown an equal number of times by each model and resulted in equal rewards, we interpret this outcome as evidence that the preferred model in each of the two groups tested enjoyed a significant degree of prestige in terms of whose example other chimpanzees chose to follow. Such prestige-based cultural transmission is a phenomenon shared with our own species. If similar biases operate in wild animal populations, the adoption of culturally transmitted innovations may be significantly shaped by the characteristics of performers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0010625

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human and animal cultural accumulation, selection of the best performing agent is learned through prestige cues.

    “In human and animal cultural accumulation, this selection is instead learned through prestige cues Barkow et al. [1975], Horner et al. [2010].”

    From Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Horner et al. [2010]

    The Discussion reports that chimpanzees preferentially copied an older, higher-ranking model with a history of success, and relates this prestige-based preference to human social learning. But the experiment tested transmission of equally effective foraging methods, not selection of the best-performing method or cultural accumulation in humans and animals. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Goodall J 1973 Cultural elements in a chimpanzee community. Menzel EW Precultural primate bahaviour (Vol. 1): Karger
  2. [21]Horner V 2010 The cultural mind of chimpanzees: how social tolerance can shape the transmission of culture. Lonsdorf EV Ross S Matsuzawa T The mind of the chimpanzee Chicago Chicago University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horner, V., Proctor, D., Bonnie, K. E., Whiten, A., & de Waal, F. B. M.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Beloit College (US)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Horner, Victoria
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-05-19
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e10625
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137020248
Cited by
245
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (RR‐00165)
  • Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University (-00165, RR 00165)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
prestige bias, cultural learning, chimpanzees, social learning, cultural transmission, foraging behavior, social status, imitation, animal cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Culture, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Social Dominance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review