CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 142

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Markers and the Evolution of Reciprocal Exchange

Nettle, Daniel·1997·Current Anthropology
DOI 10.1086/204588
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/204588

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fact that these dimensions are cultural and subject to continuous change is highly advantageous: it allows cues of community membership to change continuously through time, demanding immersion in the cultural community for an extended period and making it difficult for imposters to pass themselves off as community members.

    “The fact that all of these are cultural and subject to continuous change (a trait they share with dialects: Nettle & Dunbar, 1997) is highly advantageous: it allows the cues of community membership to change continuously through time, thereby demanding immersion in the cultural community for an extended period of time, and making it difficult for imposters to pass themselves off as community”

    From Group size, vocal grooming and the origins of language (2017) · cites this paper as Nettle & Dunbar, 1997

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nettle, D.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1997-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
93-99
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
DOI
10.1086/204588
Cited by
142
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review