Cited by 50Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorArchaeological and Geological Studies

Modelling mechanisms of social network maintenance in hunter–gatherers

Open access
Pearce, Eiluned·2014·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

Due to decreasing resource densities, higher latitude hunter-gatherers need to maintain their social networks over greater geographic distances than their equatorial counterparts. This suggests that as latitude increases, the frequency of face-to-face interaction decreases for 'weak tie' relationships in the outer mating pool (~500-strong) and tribal (~1500-strong) layers of a hunter-gatherer social network. A key question, then, is how a hunter-gatherer tribe sustains coherence as a single identifiable unit given that members are distributed across a large geographic area. The first step in answering this question is to establish whether the expectation that network maintenance raises a challenge for hunter-gatherers is correct, or whether sustaining inter-group contact is in fact trivial. Here I present a null model that represents mobile groups as randomly and independently moving gas particles. The aim of this model is to examine whether face-to-face contact can be maintained with every member of an individual's tribe at all latitudes even under the baseline assumption of random movement. Contrary to baseline expectations, the number of encounters between groups predicted by the gas model cannot support tribal cohesion and is significantly negatively associated with absolute latitude. In addition, above ~40 degrees latitude random mobility no longer produces a sufficient number of encounters between groups to maintain contact across the 500-strong mating pool. These model predictions suggest that the outermost layers of hunter-gatherers' social networks may require additional mechanisms of support in the form of strategies that either enhance encounter rates, such as coordinated mobility patterns, or lessen the need for face-to-face interaction, such as the use of symbolic artefacts to represent social affiliations. Given the predicted decline in encounters away from the equator, such additional supports might be most strongly expressed at high latitudes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.004

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social networks provide practical and emotional support as well as providing a means of gaining new information and disseminating the cultural knowledge crucial for human survival.

    “Social networks provide practical and emotional support as well as providing a means of gaining new information and disseminating the cultural knowledge crucial for human survival [7–11].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bettinger RA Billman BR Feinman GM From traveler to processor: Regional trajectories of hunter-gatherer sedentism in the Inyo-Mono Region, California Settlement pattern studies in the americas: Fifty years since Virú 1999 39 55 Smithsonian Institution Press Washington DC
  2. Guemple L Alliance in Eskimo Societies Proceedings of the American Ethological Society 1971 University of Washington Press
  3. Nettle D Linguistic Diversity 1999 Oxford University Press Oxford
  4. van Andel TH Davies WD Neanderthals and Modern Humans in the European Landscape of the Last Glaciation - Archaeological Results of the Stage 3 Project 2003 The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Cambridge Simulations provided [online] at: ftp://ftp.essc.psu.edu/pub/emsei/pollard/Stage3/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearce, E.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearce, Eiluned
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
50
Pages
403-413
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010237856
Cited by
50
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
60.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (295663)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
hunter-gatherers, intergroup contact, face-to-face interaction, weak ties, latitude, encounter rate, social affiliation, mobile groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review