The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information
Abstract
Propositions regarding consumers' differential skepticism for search, experience, and credence claims are tested in an experiment using adult consumers. The results provide clear support for Nelson's (1970) hypotheses that consumers are more skeptical of experience than search attribute claims and more skeptical of subjective than of objective claims. No support is found, however, for the Darby and Kami (1973) hypothesis that consumers will be more skeptical of credence than of experience attribute claims or for the hypothesis that consumers will not be less skeptical of experience claims for low-priced goods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whilst independent and distinct, the impact of claim specificity on claim credibility is similar to that of objective (rather than subjective) information (Ford, Smith and Swasy, 1990; Holbrook, 1978), and of substantive (rather than associative) claims (Chan, 2000; Chan and Lau, 2004).”
From How Claim Specificity Can Improve Claim Credibility in Green Advertising: Measures that Can Boost Outcomes From Environmental Product Claims (2018) · cites this paper as Ford, Smith and Swasy, 1990
Citations
Cites
Nelson, P. J. (1974) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260231 · Cited by 3,412
Stigler, G. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_86 · Cited by 3,333
Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298504900203 · Cited by 2,824
Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience
Hoch, S. J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1986) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209062 · Cited by 908
The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements
Edell, J. A., & Staelin, R. (1983) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208944 · Cited by 585
Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitude
Holbrook, M. B. (1978) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150624 · Cited by 435
An Experimental Examination of the Economics of Information
Urbany, J. E. (1986) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209065 · Cited by 191
The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion
Yalch, R. F., & Elmore-Yalch, R. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208988 · Cited by 190
A direct test of the 'lemons' model: the market for used pickup trucks
Bond, E. W. W. (2002) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/1843760258.00023 · Cited by 153
An Empirical Test of the Search, Experience and Credence Attributes Framework
Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1988) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe Misuse of Repeated Measures Analysis in Marketing Research
LaTour, S. A., & Miniard, P. W. (1983) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378302000106 · Cited by 92
Recent Developments in FTC Policy on Deception
Ford, G. T., & Calfee, J. E. (1986) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298605000307 · Cited by 80
Self-citationNon-use benefits of mandatory consumer information programs
Padberg, D. I. (1977) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/bf00382718 · Cited by 36
An Experimental Investigation of the Documentation of Advertising Claims
Sheffet, M. J. (1983) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1983.10672826 · Cited by 35
An Experiment in the Economics of Advertising
Bloom, P. N., & Krips, J. (1982) · Journal of Marketing & Public Policy · doi:10.1177/074391568200100103 · Cited by 23
On Measuring the Informational Efficiency of Consumer Markets
Ratchford, B. T., & Gupta, P. B. (1987) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.Com1
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721420 · Cited by 2,952
The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001 · Cited by 2,075
Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861 · Cited by 1,463
What makes a helpful online review? a study of customer reviews on amazon.com
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017447.2017457 · Cited by 1,287
Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650295 · Cited by 1,043
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 433
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2153194202
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 25.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- advertising skepticism, advertising claims, information economics, consumer trust in advertising
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review