Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis
Abstract
The category of astronomical time is only one of several concepts of time. Such concepts differ in the fields of philosophy, psychology, and economics. An operational definition of expressions of time in common usage shows that social phenomena are frequently adopted as a frame of reference so that units of time are often fixed by the rhythm of collective life. The need for social collaboration is at the root of social systems of time. Social time is qualitatively differentiated according to the beliefs and customs common to the group. Social time is not continuous but is interrupted by critical dates. All calendrical systems arise from and are perpetuated by social requirements. They arise from social differentiation and a widening area of social interaction. It is possible that the introduction of social time as a methodological category would enhance the discovery of social periodicities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concept of the moon as a time indicator and lord of time has an inherent socio-cultural aspect, according to the theory of 'social time.'
“A socio-cultural aspect is inherent in the concept of the moon as a time indicator and lord of time, according to the theory of”
From Conceptualizations of the Moon (2024) · cites this paper as Sorokin and Merton 1937
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temporality in Medical Work: Time also Matters
Reddy, M. C., Dourish, P., & Pratt, W. (2006) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-005-9010-z · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Making Memories: Why Time Matters
Kelley, P., Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00400 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Conceptualizations of the Moon
Altmann-Wendling, V. (2024) · UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology · doi:10.5070/g9.3924 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sorokin, P. A., & Merton, R. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1937-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 615-629
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W4244183209
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Humanities and Social Sciences
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Keywords
- social time, concept of time, astronomical time, social rhythms, calendrical systems, collective life, social differentiation, social interaction, critical date
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review