Cited by 459Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesHigher Education Research StudiesParental Involvement in Education

Social Class, Parental Encouragement, and Educational Aspirations

Sewell, William H., Shah, Vimal P.·1968·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

In this study of a randomly selected cohort of 10,318 Wisconsin high school seniors, correlational, path, and cross-tabular analyses show that socioeconomic status, intelligence, and parental encouragement all have substantial independent relationships to college plans of males as well as of females and that neither intelligence nor parental encouragement-individually or jointly-can completely account for social class differences in college plans. It substantiates, however, the claim made by other investigators using less rigorous methods and less representative samples that parental encouragement is a powerful intervening variable between socioeconomic class background and intelligence of the child and his educational aspirations. Parental encouragement appears to have its strongest effect on the college plans of males and females who score relatively high on intelligence and come from families occupying relatively high socioeconomic position. Also, ability continues to accentuate the social class differences in aspirations of both males and females regardless of parental encouragement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/224530

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social psychological model includes occupational attainment, educational attainment, occupational aspiration, educational aspiration, significant others' influence, high school performance, socioeconomic status, and high school cognitive ability as factors.

    “Factors included in the social psychological model are occupational attainment, educational attainment, occupational aspiration, educational aspiration (Stage & Hossler, 1989), significant others' influence (Sewell & Shah, 1968), high school performance, socioeconomic status ([SES)], Hearn, 1984;Rumberger, 1983;Sewell & Shah, 1968;Stone & Aliaga, 2005), and high school cognitive ability (Fuller, M”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sewell, W. H., & Shah, V. P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin System (US)
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1968-03
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
559-572
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2040071940
Cited by
457
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
FWCI
62.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
social class, parental encouragement, educational aspirations, higher education aspirations, socioeconomic status, intelligence, high school seniors, gender differences, mediators
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aptitude, Attitude, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review