Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys

Goodman, Leo A.·1972·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

This article shows how the combined use of direct estimation methods and indirect testing procedures, which was advocated by Goodman (1970-1971a), can beapplied in survey analysis. this approach to survey analysis replaces a "causal system" diagram (of the kind used, e.g., by Davis 1971) by a more quantitativelyexplicit model of the system, which then leads to a more direct and more unifiedassessment of the relationships among the variables in the system. The methods presented in the present article can also help the survey analyst to determine whether his survey data support or negate a given hypothesized causal system; and in some cases these methods can be used to determine alternative causal systems that provide better descriptions of the phenomena under investigation. To illustrate the application of these methods, we shall reanalyze data that were analyzed recently by Davis (1971) and earlier by Wilner, Walkley, and Cook (1955) in their well-known study of the "contact hypothesis." We also include in the present article some new results on how the relationship between two given dichotomous variables is affected by the introduction of additional variables.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/225258

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, L. A.
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1972-05
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1035-1086
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2026237194
Cited by
361
References
0
FWCI
118.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/225258
The paper
Goodman, L. A. (1972). A General Model for the Analysis of Surveys. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/225258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.