The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects
Abstract
A long tradition in social science explains recruitment to religious cults and sects on the basis of a congruence between the ideology of a group and the deprivations of those who join. A more recent approach to recruitment argues that interpersonal bonds between members and potential recruits are the essential element. In this paper we first show that these are complementary, not competing, approaches. Then, because the available evidential base for the role of interpersonal bonds is limited and qualitative, we present quantitative data pertaining to three quite different radical religious groups. In each case there is overwhelming support for the crucial role played by social networks in the formation and growth of such groups. Next we seek the boundaries of this phenomenon.Available studies suggest that not merely cult and sect recruitment, but commitment to conventional faiths as well, is supported by social networks.However, networks do not seem to play an important role in acceptance of mildly deviant occult beliefs. Belief in seances and tarot cards, for example, seems to spread via the mass media with little mediation by social networks. We discuss the implications of these findings for a theory of cult and sect recruitment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The Origins of Totalitarianism
Arendt, H. (2018) · Princeton Readings in Political Thought · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.50 · Cited by 5,173
Wirth, L. (1995) · Metropolis · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-23708-1_6 · Cited by 2,738
Theory of Collective Behavior.
Turner, R. H., & Smelser, N. J. (1963) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089929 · Cited by 1,294
Religion and Society in Tension.
Yinger, J. M., Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090948 · Cited by 1,029
Self-citationjoin, F. J. F., & Whyte, W. F. (1943) · Cited by 965
Greeley, A. M., & Gans, H. (1964) · International Migration Digest · doi:10.2307/3002906 · Cited by 901
Wrong, D. H., & Kornhauser, W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092098 · Cited by 788
Theory of Collective Behavior.
Lang, K., & Smelser, N. J. (1963) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575702 · Cited by 728
On Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective
Lofland, J., & Stark, R. (2018) · Cults in Context · doi:10.4324/9780203794265-11 · Cited by 563
Self-citation
Cited by
Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: points of commonality, points of departure
Hill, P. C., Pargament, K. I., Hood, R. W., McCullough, Jr., Swyers, J. P., Larson, D. B., & Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00119 · Cited by 1,623
The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda
Mathras, D., Cohen, A. B., Mandel, N., & Mick, D. G. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.08.001 · Cited by 399
Everton, S. F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136877 · Cited by 277
Embodying the Faith: Religious Practice and the Making of a Muslim Moral Habitus
Winchester, D. (2008) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.0.0038 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-05
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1376-1395
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2116016199
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 60.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/227169
- The paper
- Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1980). Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/227169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.