The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Academic Performance and Personality Traits of Chinese Children: "Onlies" Versus Others
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine whether the academic and personality outcomes of only children in China are similar to those of only children in the West. Several reviews of the extensive Western literature indicate that only children are remarkably similar to children with siblings. The few differences between them are concentrated in academic areas, where only children have the advantage. In China few children grew up without siblings until 1979, when to one-child policy was initiated. Since then, over 90% of newly formed families in the large urban areas have only one child. The incidence of one-child families in the rural areas is much smaller. The results of our 1987 survey of 1,460 schoolchildren and their parents and teachers, in the urban and rural areas of Changchun, a large industrial city in Jilin Province in northeastern China, contain many findings similar to those of surveys in the West, with one exception. Among urban children, those without siblings have higher academic scores than those with siblings, but these advantages are not found among rural children. Moreover, when only children are compared to firstborns, no differences are found once appropriate background controls are introduced. Also consistent with Western results, only children do not appear to differ from children with siblings in terms of two personality dimensions representing childhood adjustment in China, as judged by both their mothers and teachers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have found no significant cognitive or behavioral differences between only children and children with a sibling (Poston & Yu 1985, Poston & Falbo 1990, Song & Wang 2019).”
From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Poston & Falbo 1990
Citations
Cites
The Only Child in America: Prejudice versus Performance
Blake, J. (1981) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1972763 · Cited by 130
Poston, D. L., & Yu, M.-Y. (1985) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932000015583 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effects of China’s universal two-child policy
Zeng, Y., & Hesketh, T. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31405-2 · Cited by 701
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839 · Cited by 120
THE RISK OF MOTHERS LOSING AN ONLY CHILD IN CHINA
JIANG, Q., LI, Y., & SÁNCHEZ-BARRICARTE, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932013000540 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Poston, & Falbo, T.
- ORCID
- Falbo, Toni
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 433-451
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2024327774
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- only children, one-child policy, academic performance, personality traits, siblings, firstborn children, urban-rural differences, Chinese children, Changchun
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review