The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status Homogamy in the United States
Abstract
According to classical works on social stratification, status homogamy can be regarded as an indicator of the "openness" of society. In contrast to previous approaches, this article treats marriage choice as a multidimensional phenomenon and makes a distinction between ascriptive- and achievement-oriented characteristics. Ascriptive status homogamy is measured by the similarity of spouses with respect to their fathers' occupational class, while the achieved dimension of status homogamy is measured by the similarity of spouses' educational attainment. Multivariate log-linear models are used to explore the relative importance of these factors for the choice of a spouse, and the article tests the hypothesis that there has been a transition from ascription to achievement in patterns of marriage selection. This study first demonstrates empirically that previously conducted synthetic cohort analyses of educational homogamy suffer from selection biases and then, using the Occupational Change in a Generation (OCG) surveys, analyzes two real marriage cohorts. The analyses show that education is a more important boundary in marriage selection than social-class origins and that educational homogamy has increased over time. At the same time, there is some indication that ascription has become a less important boundary in marriage selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Cited by
Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends
Kalmijn, M. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395 · Cited by 2,121
Self-citationHave American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences
Schwartz, C. R. (2013) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544 · Cited by 688
Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy
Kalmijn, M. (1991) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096256 · Cited by 458
Self-citationBreaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990
Qian, Z. (1997) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061704 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalmijn, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 496-523
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2061903015
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status Homogamy in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/229786
- The paper
- Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status Homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/229786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.