Cited by 3,331Banking stability, regulation, efficiencyCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsCorporate Finance and Governance

Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt

Open access
Diamond, Douglas W.·1991·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

This paper determines when a debt contract will be monitored by lenders. This is the choice between borrowing directly (issuing a bond, without monitoring) and borrowing through a bank that monitors to alleviate moral hazard. This provides a theory of bank loan demand and of the role of monitoring in circumstances in which reputation effects are important. A key result is that borrowers with credit ratings toward the middle of the spectrum rely on bank loans, and in periods of high interest rates or low future profitability, higher-rated borrowers choose to borrow from banks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/261775

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Firms with access to public debt markets may try to reduce the control of their banks by issuing public debt, even though public debt may entail higher costs.

    “Some research suggests that these ®rms may try to reduce the control of their banks by issuing public debt, even though public debt may entail higher costs (Diamond, 1991(Diamond, , 1993;;Rajan, 1992;Houston and James, 1996).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamond, D. W.
Affiliations
Federal Reserve (US)
Corresponding author
Diamond, Douglas W.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1991-08
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
689-721
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W2118889105
Cited by
3,331
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 124 · 2012: 140
FWCI
47.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Chicago
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (8896223)
  • Yale University
  • University of Chicago
  • Yale School of Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
bank lending, bond issuance, monitoring, moral hazard, reputation effects, credit ratings, interest rates, debt contracts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review