The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Neoclassical Model of Family Labor Supply and Fertility
Open accessAbstract
The McElroy-Horney Nash-bargaining model of family demand behavior relaxes the restriction that nonearned income of husband and wife had the identical effect on family labor supply and commodity demands. This restriction of the neoclassical model of family behavior is tested for the determination of husband and wife labor supply and fertility based on the 1981 Socioeconomic Survey of Thailand. The neoclassical restriction is rejected for female labor supply and fertility. Another unexplored limitation of family demand studies, due to the sample self selection of intact marriages, is empirically treated through alternative estimation strategies. In this case, a more sharply focused theory of marital behavior is needed to identify family demand models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of the Allocation of Time
Becker, G. S. (1965) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228949 · Cited by 10,354
Nash, J. F. (1950) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907266 · Cited by 7,840
(1976) · Annals of Economic and Social Measurement · Cited by 5,035
A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in GamesPreprint
Harsanyi, J. C., & Selten, R. (1988) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,104
Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach
Thomas, D. (1990) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145670 · Cited by 1,948
Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand
McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2526280 · Cited by 1,905
A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households
Pollak, R. A. (1985) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 739
The Empirical Content of Nash-Bargained Household Behavior
McElroy, M. B. (1990) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145667 · Cited by 683
The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply
Ashenfelter, O., & Heckman, J. (1974) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913686 · Cited by 319
Tp, S. (1981) · Cited by 227
Cited by
Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market
Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261912 · Cited by 1,544
The Declining Significance of Guanxi in China's Economic Transition
Guthrie, D. (1998) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0305741000002034 · Cited by 647
Vyas, S., & Watts, C. (2009) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.1500 · Cited by 603
The gender asset gap: What do we know and why does it matter?
Deere, C. D., & Doss, C. R. (2006) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545700500508056 · Cited by 594
Gender of Children, Bargaining Power, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in China
Li, L., & Wu, X. (2011) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1353/jhr.2011.0014 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, T. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Human Resources
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 599
- ISSN
- 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142571486
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 18.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Neoclassical Model of Family Labor Supply and Fertility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/145669
- The paper
- Schultz, T. P. (1990). Testing the Neoclassical Model of Family Labor Supply and Fertility. The Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.2307/145669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.