The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance
Abstract
A small carefully controlled field experiment tests the effects of alternative interviewing strategies on the quality of responses and on field performance. Measures include ability to answer complex knowledge and attitudinal items, response validity, and willingness and consistency in providing personal information. Field performance is assessed by examining differential length of the interview, number of contacts required, suitable times for interviewing, respondent preferences for interview strategy, and interviewer effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
Nederhof, A. J. (1985) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150303 · Cited by 2,340
Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D., & Coates, T. J. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339 · Cited by 956
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires
Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/346010 · Cited by 916
A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires
Yu, J., & Cooper, H. (1983) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151410 · Cited by 706
McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, T. F.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-65
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W1984076839
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/268267
- The paper
- Rogers, T. F. (1976). Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance. Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1086/268267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
