The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use
Abstract
The effects of interview mode on 18- to 34-year-olds' self-reported tobacco, alcohol, marijuna, and cocaine use were investigated. RDD telephone and personal drug use surveys of the state of New Jersey were conducted in 1986–87. In the personal interview, respondents recorded their drug use on self-administrated answer sheets. Compared to the area probability sample in the personal interview, RDD yielded a sample of blacks higher in income and education, and more likely to be married and currently employed; white SES was also higher in the telephone sample, but to a lesser degree than for blacks. Controlling for demographic characteristics and RDD's exclusion of non-telephone households, the telephone survey yielded significantly lower estimates of blacks' alcohol consumption, and lifetime and recent marijuana use. Whites' alcohol consumption was slightly lower by telephone; otherwise, estimates of whites' use of the four substances were nearly identical in the two modes. Sample coverage, respondent demographic characteristics, and racial matching of interviewer and respondent did not account for the significant mode differences. Characteristics of the interview situation itself, such as provision of privacy in the self-administered format, may have influenced tendencies toward socially desirable responding to a threatening topic such as drug use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 · Cited by 3,057
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires
Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/346010 · Cited by 916
McHorney, C. A., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002 · Cited by 608
Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing axis I and II disorders
Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.11.1593 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Aquilino, W. S., & Sciuto, L. A. L.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976078748
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/269212
- The paper
- Aquilino, W. S., & Sciuto, L. A. L. (1990). Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use. Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1086/269212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.