The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research
Abstract
This article investigates patterns in audience reception of 16 news stories that received prominent media coverage in the summer and fall of 1989. Using a national sample of American adults, it compares education, self-reported rates of media use, interpersonal communication, and prior levels of general political knowledge as predictors of individual differences in recall of current news events. Results indicate that respondents' background level of political knowledge is the strongest and most consistent predictor of current news story recall across a wide range of topics, suggesting that there is indeed a general audience for news and that this audience is quite sharply stratified by preexisting levels of background knowledge. Thus, in survey research applications that require estimates of individual differences in the reception of potentially influential political communications, a measure of general prior knowledge—not a measure of news media use—is likely to be the most effective indicator. The article further concludes that the tendency of individuals to acquire news and information on a domain- or topic-specific basis fails to undermine the value of political knowledge as a general measure of propensity for news recall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Willigan, W. L., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708755 · Cited by 2,157
Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Roshwalb, I., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247718 · Cited by 1,880
Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267786 · Cited by 1,537
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.3.258 · Cited by 1,108
Interaction of Media, Cognition, and Learning
Salomon, G. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203052945 · Cited by 768
Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure
Bartels, L. M. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2939040 · Cited by 724
Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962585 · Cited by 701
An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation
Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962397 · Cited by 649
Cited by
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization
Hetherington, M. J. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401003045 · Cited by 1,038
Radio's Impact on Public Spending
Stromberg, D. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839560 · Cited by 729
The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation
Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082427 · Cited by 685
Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650203253371 · Cited by 638
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, V., & Zaller, J.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129912544
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 50.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/269363
- The paper
- Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research. Public Opinion Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1086/269363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.