The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent Mutations
Abstract
The consideration that the wild population is immensely larger than the numbers bred experimentally even in Drosophila, and that the duration of the species is still more disproportionate to the experimental periods, leads to the conclusion that the majority of the mutations which we can hope to observe in cultures must have occurred previously with very great total frequency in the wild species. The reaction of the wild type to mutations is known in many cases to be capable of a somewhat rapid modification in experimental conditions, by the selection through differential viability of factors capable of modifying this response. It may be calculated that with mutation rates of the order of one in a million the corresponding selection in the state of nature, though extremely slow, can not safely be neglected in the case of the heterozygotes. The observed behavior of multiple allelomorphs largely supports, though that of specific modifiers seems to oppose, the view that complete dominance generally may be regarded as a product of such selective modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Morgan, T. H., Bridges, C. B., & Sturtevant, A. H. (1988) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 215
Cited by
CANALIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERS
WADDINGTON, C. H. (1942) · Nature · doi:10.1038/150563a0 · Cited by 3,255
Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Koonin, E. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · Cited by 1,323
The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study
Cook, L. M., & Saccheri, I. J. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.92 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, R. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1928-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 679
- Pages
- 115-126
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2075848394
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/280193
- The paper
- Fisher, R. A. (1928). The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent Mutations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/280193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.