The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution in Sexual and Asexual Populations
Abstract
In an asexual population two favorable mutants can be incorporated into the population only if one occurs in a descendant of the individual in which the other occurred. In a sexual population both mutants can be incorporated through recombination. A mathematical formulation is given of the relative rates of incorporation of the new mutations with and without recombination. Recombination is of the greatest advantage when the double mutant is more advantageous than either single mutant, when the mutant effects are small, when mutations occur with high frequency, and when the population is large. On the other hand, for the incorporation of individually deleterious but collectively beneficial mutations, recombination can be disadvantageous. Close linkage has effects similar to those of asexual reproduction. Experimental data on DDT resistance in Drosophila and chloramphenicol resistance in bacteria are cited showing greater development of coadaptation in an asexual system. The evolution of diploidy from haploidy confers an immediate reduction in the mutation load by concealment of deleterious recessives, but this advantage is lost once a new equilibrium is reached. Thus the development of diploidy may be because of an immediate advantage rather than because of any permanent benefit. On the other hand, there are other possible advantages of diploidy, such as heterosis and protection from somatic mutations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
THE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE OF RECOMBINATION
Felsenstein, J. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/78.2.737 · Cited by 1,711
On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates
Kimura, M. (1967) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300010284 · Cited by 337
Self-citationThe ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids
Hickman, M. A., Zeng, G., Forche, A., Hirakawa, M. P., Abbey, D., Harrison, B. D., Wang, Y.-M., Su, C.-H., Bennett, R. J., Wang, Y., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11865 · Cited by 284
Paquin, C., & Adams, J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302495a0 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1965-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 909
- Pages
- 439-450
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2035998101
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution in Sexual and Asexual Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282389
- The paper
- Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M. (1965). Evolution in Sexual and Asexual Populations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.