Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Cost of Reproduction in Annual Meadow Grass

Law, Richard·1979·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Studies of the evolution of life histories assume that there are costs to reproduction, although there is little experimental evidence for their existence. In this paper some populations of annual meadow grass (Poa annua L.) are analyzed, to test for the existence of these costs. The results show that there is a price to be paid for high rates of reproduction early in life, in lower rates and smaller plant size subsequently. There are also signs that high rates of reproduction very early in life increase subsequent risks of mortality. A possible form for the relationship is considered from a model of reproduction, growth, and survival. The implications of the observed and predicted costs to the evolution of life histories in annual meadow grass are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283361

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Law, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1979-01
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
3-16
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2764483196
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cost of Reproduction in Annual Meadow Grass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283361
The paper
Law, R. (1979). The Cost of Reproduction in Annual Meadow Grass. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283361

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.