The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grazing as an Optimization Process: Grass-Ungulate Relationships in the Serengeti
Abstract
A substantial literature is reviewed which indicates that compensatory growth upon tissue damage by herbivory is a major component of plant adaptation to herbivores. Experiments in Tanzania's Serengeti National Park showed that net above-ground primary productivity of grasslands was strongly regulated by grazing intensity in wet-season concentration areas of the large ungulate fauna. Moderate grazing stimulated productivity up to twice the levels in ungrazed control plots, depending upon soil moisture availability. Productivity was maintained at control values even under very intense grazing, suggesting that conventional definitions of overgrazing may be inapplicable to these native plant-herbivore systems. A laboratory clipping experiment with a sedge abundant in one of the most intensely utilized regions resulted in a maximum net above-ground productivity of 11.6 g/m2 · day when clipped daily at a height of 4 cm. Few plant species have been reported with the ability to maintain a significant level of productivity under such intense clipping. This suggests that the high grazing load of the Serengeti ecosystem has constituted strong selection on the plants for compensatory growth upon defoliation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategies in Herbivory by Mammals: The Role of Plant Secondary Compounds
Freeland, W. J., & Janzen, D. H. (1974) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282907 · Cited by 1,358
Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production
Mattson, W. J., & Addy, N. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.190.4214.515 · Cited by 573
The patterns of rainfall in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania
NORTON‐GRIFFITHS, M., HERLOCKER, D., & PENNYCUICK, L. (1975) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1975.tb00144.x · Cited by 228
Movements of the migratory wildebeest population in the Serengeti area between 1960 and 1973
PENNYCUICK, L. (1975) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1975.tb00124.x · Cited by 109
Fluctuations in the rainfall of the Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania
Pennycuick, L., & Norton-Griffiths, M. (1976) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/3038141 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Herbivory in Relation to Plant Nitrogen Content
Mattson, W. J. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003 · Cited by 3,425
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates
Hobbs, N. T. (1996) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802368 · Cited by 1,016
Rotational grazing on rangelands, reconciliation of perception and experimental evidence
Briske, D. D., Derner, J. D., Brown, J. R., Fuhlendorf, S. D., Teague, W. R., Havstad, K. M., Gillen, R. L., Ash, A. J., & Willms, W. D. (2008) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/06-159r.1 · Cited by 711
Phan, T. N., Kuch, V., & Lehnert, L. W. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12152411 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- McNaughton, S. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1979-05
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 691-703
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2054999315
- Cited by
- 1,265
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grazing as an Optimization Process: Grass-Ungulate Relationships in the Serengeti. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283426
- The paper
- McNaughton, S. J. (1979). Grazing as an Optimization Process: Grass-Ungulate Relationships in the Serengeti. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.