The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Influencing Leaf Choice by Howler Monkeys: A Test of Some Hypotheses of Food Selection by Generalist Herbivores
Abstract
Some theories on the foraging strategies of generalist herbivores suggest that the food choices of such animals are greatly influenced by the quality and antiquality components of potential foods. Many herbivores selectively feed on young rather than mature foliage. It has been hypothesized that young leaves are preferred because they have higher contents of protein and/or lower contents of toxic secondary compounds. These and several other hypotheses were tested with data from a long-term study of the feeding ecology of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), using a cost/benefit approach. Samples of young and mature leaves from the same species were analyzed for total protein, cell wall constituents, total phenolics, presence of condensed tannins, and total nonstructural carbohydrates. The results support the hypothesis that more than one factor determine howler leaf choices. The most important factors (relating to food content) appeared to be protein and fiber content, with perhaps some influence from secondary compounds. For howlers and other relatively small mammalian herbivores, the protein: fiber ratio may be a good predictor of leaf choices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Strategies in Herbivory by Mammals: The Role of Plant Secondary Compounds
Freeland, W. J., & Janzen, D. H. (1974) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282907 · Cited by 1,358
Cited by
Herbivory in Relation to Plant Nitrogen Content
Mattson, W. J. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003 · Cited by 3,425
Herbivory and Defensive Characteristics of Tree Species in a Lowland Tropical Forest
Coley, P. D. (1983) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942495 · Cited by 1,768
Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work
Lucas, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735011 · Cited by 550
MILTON, K. (1981) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1981.83.3.02a00020 · Cited by 501
Self-citationChapman, C. A., Wasserman, M. D., Gillespie, T. R., Speirs, M. L., Lawes, M. J., Saj, T. L., & Ziegler, T. E. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20477 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Milton, K.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1979-09
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-378
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2017609418
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Influencing Leaf Choice by Howler Monkeys: A Test of Some Hypotheses of Food Selection by Generalist Herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283485
- The paper
- Milton, K. (1979). Factors Influencing Leaf Choice by Howler Monkeys: A Test of Some Hypotheses of Food Selection by Generalist Herbivores. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.