Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Species Richness in Streams of Different Size from the Same Drainage Basin

Minshall, G. Wayne, Petersen,, Robert C., Nimz, Curtis F.·1985·The American Naturalist

Abstract

The species richness of stream benthic invertebrates was studied along a longitudinal profile of the Salmon River, Idaho, during spring, summer, and autumn. Sampling was done using replicate rocks and the analytical approach of Stout and Vandermeer (1975) was used to calculate theoretical number of species present, relative immigration rate, and relative spatial heterogeneity. Species richness varied with stream size, being highest in midorder streams and lower in headwater and high order streams. This downstream shift in species richness conforms to the river continuum concept (Vannote et al. 1980). Possible cause is associated with varying temperature regimes in the different-sized streams as well as other factors. Species richness also varied with season depending on stream size. Low order streams were more individualistic, probably because of a greater influence of local (terrestrial) environmental conditions, but showed a higher richness in summer than in autumn. Larger streams were more similar and showed a higher richness in autumn than in summer. Other community-level indicators, such as relative immigration rate and extinction rate, also showed seasonal differences. We conclude that different macroinvertebrate community types having characteristics of either nonequilibrium (density-independent, opportunistic) or equilibrium conditions can be found in streams from the same drainage basin depending on location along the river continuum and time of the year. These findings have important implications for future studies of stream communities as well as for those of predation and competition in streams. Among other things, we propose that the interactive/noninteractive model of Wilson (1969) may be more appropriate for stream invertebrate communities than those assuming strictly nonequilibrium or equilibrium conditions. We further suggest that any attempt to classify or compare stream communities, such as was done for tropical versus midlatitude streams by Stout and Vandermeer (1975), must take seasonality and position along the downstream gradient into account.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284326

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Minshall, G. W., Petersen, & Nimz, C. F.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1985-01
Volume
125
Issue
1
Pages
16-38
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2064570535
Cited by
211
References
2
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species Richness in Streams of Different Size from the Same Drainage Basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284326
The paper
Minshall, G. W., Petersen, & Nimz, C. F. (1985). Species Richness in Streams of Different Size from the Same Drainage Basin. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284326

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.