The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ambient Noise in the Evolution of Bird Song
Abstract
Morton found that the average emphasized frequency in the songs of tropical bird species in low-forest habitats was lower than that of species in grassland or edge habitats. He suggested that this was due to a frequency window around 1585-2500 Hz in low-forest habitats, and that there was selection to produce songs with frequencies in this window in order to increase the transmission distance of the songs. In the present study, we analyze the constraints of body size and evolutionary history on the ability of avian species to respond to this selection. Also, we examine the spectral distribution of ambient noise as an additional selective factor. There is a correlation between body size and the emphasized frequency of the song for the species analyzed by Morton. Larger birds produce songs with lower emphasized frequencies. Morton's demonstration that birds in the low forest produce songs with lower frequencies is confounded by the fact that larger birds also live in this habitat. Phylogeny is also a potentially confounding factor, since the allometry of size and frequency differs among taxonomic units. Our analyses, however, control for body size and, to some extent, phylogeny, and suggest that there has been an evolutionary response to selection for low-frequency songs by birds in low-forest habitats. Our analysis of ambient noise in low-forest and grassland habitats suggests that this selection might result in part from a relatively quiet region of the ambient noise spectrum in low-forest habitat because of the comparative lack of wind-generated noise and of the abundance of insect-generated sound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds
Morton, E. S. (1975) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282971 · Cited by 1,665
Cited by
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution
Endler, J. A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285308 · Cited by 1,960
Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape
Pijanowski, B. C., Villanueva-Rivera, L. J., Dumyahn, S. L., Farina, A., Krause, B. L., Napoletano, B. M., Gage, S. H., & Pieretti, N. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6 · Cited by 1,334
THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS
EY, E., & FISCHER, J. (2009) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2009.9753613 · Cited by 381
SONG DIVERGENCE BY SENSORY DRIVE IN AMAZONIAN BIRDS: SENSORY DRIVE IN BIRDSONG EVOLUTION
Tobias, J. A., Aben, J., Brumfield, R. T., Derryberry, E. P., Halfwerk, W., Slabbekoorn, H., & Seddon, N. (2010) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01067.x · Cited by 184
Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Derryberry, G. E., Claramunt, S., Seeholzer, G. F., Brumfield, R. T., & Tobias, J. A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3760 · Cited by 120
“…that larger birds produce songs at lower peak, maximum and minimum frequencies, in agreement with previous empirical studies (Mason & Burns, 2015; Ryan & Brenowitz, 1985; Seddon, 2005; Tubaro & Mahler, 1998; Wallschäger, 1980) and consistent with the traditional understanding of how birds…”
Dahlin, C. R., & Benedict, L. (2014) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12182 · Cited by 114
‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song
de Boer, R. A., Eens, M., & Müller, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1142 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, M. J., & Brenowitz, E. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2089046376
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.