Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of Prey Selection: Implications of Predator Foraging Tactics

Greene, Charles H.·1986·The American Naturalist

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the consequences of different predator foraging tactics on patterns of prey selection. Foraging tactics are categorized on the basis of two dichotomies, the first concerning predator encounter tactics and the second concerning the handling tactics employed by predators to subdue prey. The former dichotomy distinguishes between ambush and cruising encounter tactics, the latter between entangling and raptorial handling tactics. Two consistent trends in prey selection are revealed by examining the patterns of prey selection exhibited by a variety of zooplanktivorous, invertebrate predators. The first trend concerns the tendency of ambush predators to take larger and older prey, relative to those taken by cruising predators. This trend was predicted and is presumed to be a general feature of predator-prey interactions. The second trend concerns the tendency of ambush predators feeding on Calanus to exhibit bimodal preyselection patterns, in contrast to the unimodal patterns exhibited by cruisers. This trend was not predicted and is certainly not a general feature of predator-prey interactions, but it does serve to illustrate the heuristic value of the ambushcruising dichotomy. At present, too few studies are available to compare trends associated with the entangling-raptorial dichotomy. However, a brief discussion of the potential interaction effects between predator foraging tactics and prey defensive tactics points out that both dichotomies merit closer examination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284608

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Greene, C. H.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1986-12
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
824-839
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2085151354
Cited by
168
References
1
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Prey Selection: Implications of Predator Foraging Tactics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284608
The paper
Greene, C. H. (1986). Patterns of Prey Selection: Implications of Predator Foraging Tactics. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.