The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age and size-selective predation on larval fishes: the bigger-is-better hypothesis revisited
Open accessAbstract
A combined mesocosm and microcosm approach was employed to analyze the impact of age, and of size independent of age effects, of yolk-sac capelin larvae Mallotus villosus on their vulnerability to predation.The impact by both visual (3-spined stickleback Casterosteus aculeatus) and non-visual (jellyfish Staurophora mertensi) predators was evaluated.We found, as predicted from the hterature, that the probability of capture by both predator types decreased with larval age.However, contrary to the current view, when the predators were offered a mixture, and hence a cholce, of larvae separated in age by 2 d, the probability of death by predation was higher for older larvae.We also examined size effects, independent of age effects, by generating large and small larvae of ident~cal age through artificial fertilization of eggs from selected capelin females.We found no difference in the probability of capture of small versus large larvae of the same age.Yet, when the predators were presented with a mixture, and hence a choice of small versus large larvae, the larger larvae experienced higher mortality.This, too, is counter to current thinking.We show that being smaller at a given a g e may actually confer a survival advantage to larvae.These outcomes are discussed in terms of the interacting probabilities of encounter, attack and capture which define the probability of larval death due to predation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
Larval Size and Recruitment Mechanisms in Fishes: Toward a Conceptual Framework
Miller, T. J., Crowder, L. B., Rice, J. A., & Marschall, E. A. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f88-197 · Cited by 1,326
Random Search and Insect Population Models
Rogers, D. (1972) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3474 · Cited by 1,164
Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model
Gerritsen, J., & Strickler, J. R. (1977) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f77-008 · Cited by 832
A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism
Royama, T. (1971) · Population Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02511547 · Cited by 456
Natural mortality of marine pelagic fish eggs and larvae: role of spatial patchiness
McGurk, M. (1986) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps034227 · Cited by 389
Functional Locomotor Morphology of Early Life History Stages of Fishes
Webb, P. W., & Weihs, D. (1986) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1986)115<115:flmoel>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 345
The Predator-Prey Interaction of Planktivorous Fish and Zooplankton
O’Brien, W. J. (1979) · Cited by 339
Patterns of Prey Selection: Implications of Predator Foraging Tactics
Greene, C. H. (1986) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284608 · Cited by 168
Causes of mortality in young jack mackerel
Hewitt, R. P., Theilacker, G. H., & Lo, N. (1985) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps026001 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Scharf, F., Juanes, F., & Rountree, R. (2000) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps208229 · Cited by 893
Ontogenetic Scaling of Foraging Rates and the Dynamics of a Size-Structured Consumer-Resource Model
Persson, L., Leonardsson, K., de Roos, A. M., Gyllenberg, M., & Christensen, B. (1998) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1006/tpbi.1998.1380 · Cited by 313
Pepin, P., Dower, J. F., & Davidson, F. J. M. (2003) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00221.x · Cited by 58
Miller, J. A., Teel, D. J., Baptista, A., & Morgan, C. A. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2012-0354 · Cited by 54
Growth- and size-selective mortality in pelagic larvae of a common reef fish
Sponaugle, S., Boulay, J., & Rankin, T. (2011) · Aquatic Biology · doi:10.3354/ab00370 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Litvak, M., & Leggett, W.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 13-24
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2015224336
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and size-selective predation on larval fishes: the bigger-is-better hypothesis revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps081013
- The paper
- Litvak, M., & Leggett, W. (1992). Age and size-selective predation on larval fishes: the bigger-is-better hypothesis revisited. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps081013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.