Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 727

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reproductive Harmony via Mutual Policing by Workers in Eusocial Hymenoptera

·1988·The American Naturalist

Abstract

When queens of eusocial Hymenoptera mate two or more times (assuming equal sperm contributions from males and random sperm use), the workers are more closely related to the queen's sons than to the sons of a randomly chosen worker. This suggests that workers should try to prevent other workers from reproducing, and hence producing sons, in species with queens that mate two or more times. It also provides a possible reason for the absence of reproductive workers in many hymenopteran societies. Reproductive harmony may, therefore, and counterintuitively, result from lowered relatedness among workers. Evidence from the biological literature indicates that eusocial Hymenoptera have the necessary behaviors and discriminatory ability to favor queen-produced over worker-produced males, and any such behavior is referred to as "worker policing." Population-genetics simulations of the fate of a "police allele," which confers any marginal increase in policing behavior to the workers carrying it, indicate that such an allele will invade and spread to fixation provided that queens mate two or more times. This conclusion is supported empirically by what is known about queen mating frequency and worker reproduction in the highly eusocial bees and wasps. Societies typically headed by monandrous queens, such as those of the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) and stingless bees (Meliponinae), have reproductive workers in queenright colonies; those with polyandrous queens, as in honey bees (Apis) and some yellowjacket wasps (Vespula), do not. Bumblebees and yellowjackets are suggested as critical groups for further investigating worker policing, since species with singly and multiply mated queens occur in both. Examination of the cause-effect relationship between queen mating frequency and worker policing indicates that worker policing is caused by queen polyandry but that worker policing is unlikely to cause polyandry, although it may help stabilize it if police workers show behavioral dominance. Thus, mating many times in order to increase worker policing is not envisaged as a potential strategy by which queens win reproductive conflicts with workers. Nepotistically modulated policing (i.e., reduced policing within patrilines) and increased colony-level efficiency (when worker policing increases the colony's integration and harmony) both relax the conditions for the invasion of a police allele. If worker policing increases colony-level efficiency by about 20%, a police allele can always invade even when queens mate only once. Under less stringent but still reasonable conditions, a police allele will invade if worker policing increases colony-level efficiency by only 4.4%. Effective worker policing in colonies in turn relaxes the conditions for selection for self-policing (i.e., selection at the level of the individual workers for forgoing personal reproduction).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284846

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 727

Metadata

Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1988-08
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
217-236
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2012997653
Cited by
727
References
1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Harmony via Mutual Policing by Workers in Eusocial Hymenoptera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284846
The paper
Reproductive Harmony via Mutual Policing by Workers in Eusocial Hymenoptera. (1988). The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284846

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.