The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The principles of collective animal behaviour
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the concept of self-organization has been used to understand collective behaviour of animals. The central tenet of self-organization is that simple repeated interactions between individuals can produce complex adaptive patterns at the level of the group. Inspiration comes from patterns seen in physical systems, such as spiralling chemical waves, which arise without complexity at the level of the individual units of which the system is composed. The suggestion is that biological structures such as termite mounds, ant trail networks and even human crowds can be explained in terms of repeated interactions between the animals and their environment, without invoking individual complexity. Here, I review cases in which the self-organization approach has been successful in explaining collective behaviour of animal groups and societies. Ant pheromone trail networks, aggregation of cockroaches, the applause of opera audiences and the migration of fish schools have all been accurately described in terms of individuals following simple sets of rules. Unlike the simple units composing physical systems, however, animals are themselves complex entities, and other examples of collective behaviour, such as honey bee foraging with its myriad of dance signals and behavioural cues, cannot be fully understood in terms of simple individuals alone. I argue that the key to understanding collective behaviour lies in identifying the principles of the behavioural algorithms followed by individual animals and of how information flows between the animals. These principles, such as positive feedback, response thresholds and individual integrity, are repeatedly observed in very different animal societies. The future of collective behaviour research lies in classifying these principles, establishing the properties they produce at a group level and asking why they have evolved in so many different and distinct natural systems. Ultimately, this research could inform not only our understanding of animal societies, but also the principles by which we organize our own society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,517
The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · Cited by 7,855
Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model
Reynolds, C. W. (1987) · Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/37401.37406 · Cited by 7,714
Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence
Kuramoto, Y. (1984) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3 · Cited by 7,142
Social force model for pedestrian dynamics
Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (1995) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.51.4282 · Cited by 6,845
Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems
Nìcolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,356
Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model
Reynolds, C. W. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/37402.37406 · Cited by 5,148
Simulating dynamical features of escape panic
Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35035023 · Cited by 4,916
Wilson, E. O. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,756
Cited by
Cross‐validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure
Roberts, D. R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M. S., Elith, J., Guillera‐Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., et al. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02881 · Cited by 3,689
The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics
Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010047 · Cited by 1,120
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Self-citationSocial Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices
Halloy, J., Sempo, G., Caprari, G., Rivault, C., Asadpour, M., Tâche, F., Saïd, I., Durier, V., Canonge, S., Amé, J. M., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144259 · Cited by 503
Raafat, R. M., Chater, N., & Frith, C. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- Sumpter, D. J. T.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-11-28
- Volume
- 361
- Issue
- 1465
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2147449010
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 121
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The principles of collective animal behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2005.1733
- The paper
- Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.