Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches

Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R.·1989·The American Naturalist

Abstract

An exceptionally wet year followed by two very dry years severely perturbed the food supply of cactus finches (Geospiza conirostris) on Isla Genovesa, Galapagos. This provided us with a natural experiment for detecting and interpreting selection acting on bill shape in response to the near elimination of some of the food items and availability of others. Long-billed birds had a survival disadvantage associated with the absence of Opuntia flowers and fruits, which they normally exploit. This selection event was followed by another favoring birds with deep beaks capable of extracting the only available food, arthropods from beneath the bark of trees and within Opuntia trunks and old pads. For young birds, the ability to develop (learn) techniques for extracting a new food item was a better predictor of survival than was bill shape. Among the group that acquired these skills, more of the birds with deep bills survived, as was the case for the adults. During 1984, males that obtained females had deeper bills than those that failed to do so. Because this mating advantage did not occur in years without natural selection, we suggest that birds with deep bills had more energy available for courtship. Using the same approach, we also describe a parallel case of natural selection in a sympatric congener, G. magnirostris, in which birds with deep beaks capable of cracking large and hard Cordia lutea seeds were favored. The population has undergone little or no evolutionary change in bill dimensions in response to selection during the last nine years, despite the presence of high levels of additive genetic variance. Evolutionary change has not occurred because the action of selection on one trait in one direction has been counteracted by selection in the opposite direction on another, positively correlated trait. Changes in the proportions of dry-season niches among years cause changes in the proportions of birds with certain beak morphologies and feeding skills best suited to exploiting them. Therefore, the population tracks a moving peak in an adaptive landscape under environmental fluctuations, and there is more than one individual fitness optimum within the range of phenotypes in the population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/284924

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1989-03
Volume
133
Issue
3
Pages
377-393
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2080070573
Cited by
185
References
2
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284924
The paper
Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R. (1989). Natural Selection in a Population of Darwin's Finches. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284924

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.