The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parent-Specific Gene Expression and the Triploid Endosperm
Open accessAbstract
The endosperm of flowering plants is a tissue that acquires resources from the maternal sporophyte and is in turn digested by the developing embryo in its own seed. In this respect, the endosperm takes the role filled by the female gametophyte in gymnosperms. Endosperm is a tissue unique to angiosperms. At fertilization, a male gametophyte (pollen tube) releases two sperm into the female gametophyte. One sperm fuses with the egg to form a diploid zygote, and the other sperm fuses with two female-gametophyte nuclei (known as polar nuclei) to form the triploid primary-endosperm nucleus. Therefore, the endosperm, which develops from this triploid nucleus, has an unusual genetic composition. Each nucleus contains one copy of the paternal contribution to the associated embryo and two copies of the maternal contribution. A minority of flowering plant species have endosperms of different genetic composition, but almost all share the characteristic that more of the endosperm genome is derived from the mother than from the father. Double fertilization and the formation of endosperm are often considered the major features that distinguish flowering plants from other seed plants. Because of this importance, many authors have suggested adaptive explanations for the unusual genetic constitution of endosperm. Heterozygote vigor (Brink and Cooper 1940) can explain the presence of a paternal contribution but not why the maternal contribution should be doubled. Polyploid vigor (Stebbins 1974) can explain the advantage of triploid over diploid endosperm but not the weighting toward the maternal contribution. In other words, the polyploid-vigor explanation does not explain why genome doubling should occur in the female gametophyte before fertilization, particularly given that endosperm cells often increase their ploidy by other means after fertilization (D'Amato 1984). More-recent hypotheses have treated the endosperm as a participant in conflicts of interest among mother, father, and offspring. Conflict arises because sibling offspring of one mother tend to compete with each other. Each offspring's prospects of survival and eventual reproduction are sensitive to the quantity of resources it obtains from the mother, and when some offspring obtain more resources, others tend to obtain less. Because the mother is equally related to (has an equal genetic investment in) each of her offspring, her inclusive fitness is greatest when all nonabortive offspring are provisioned equally (Smith and Fretwell 1974; Trivers 1974). However, each offspring is more closely related to itself than to its siblings. For this reason, individual offspring would benefit from some redistribution of the mother's resources toward themselves and away from their
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development
Barton, S. C., Surani, M. A. H., & Norris, M. L. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/311374a0 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy
Haig, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418300 · Cited by 1,253
“Therefore, situations can arise where paternally derived genes would maximize their profits if a resource was transferred to the current child, but maternally derived genes would maximize their profits if the resource went to the future child (Haig and Westoby, 1989; Haig, 1992).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGenome-wide associations for birth weight and correlations with adult disease
CHARGE Consortium Hematology Working Group, Horikoshi, M., Early Growth Genetics (EGG) Consortium, Beaumont, R. N., Day, F. R., Warrington, N. M., Kooijman, M. N., Fernandez-Tajes, J., Feenstra, B., van Zuydam, N. R., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19806 · Cited by 499
Genomic Imprinting and Kinship: How Good is the Evidence?
Haig, D. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142741 · Cited by 355
Self-citationParent-Dependent Loss of Gene Silencing during Interspecies Hybridization
Josefsson, C., Dilkes, B., & Comai, L. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.045 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Haig, D., & Westoby, M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-155
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2057307833
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parent-Specific Gene Expression and the Triploid Endosperm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284971
- The paper
- Haig, D., & Westoby, M. (1989). Parent-Specific Gene Expression and the Triploid Endosperm. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.