The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Costs of Reproduction in the Pink Lady's Slipper Orchid: A Four-Year Experimental Study
Abstract
The cost of current reproduction on future growth, survival, and reproduction is a central concept in evolutionary ecology, but the field evidence in plants for a cost of reproduction is weak because the appropriate experimental protocol (manipulation of the level of reproduction in an experimental group of individuals) has rarely been carried out. The pink lady's slipper orchid, Cypripedium acaule, is well suited to this design because naturally occurring flowering plants only rarely fruit, whereas virtually all hand-pollinated flowers develop into fruits. In two eastern Massachusetts populations, plants were randomly assigned to be hand-pollinated or left as controls, with the treatments repeated in four successive years. After 2 yr, treatment effects were weak at one site and absent from the other site. By the third and fourth years, the high cost of reproduction was clearly demonstrated in a lower growth and flowering rate of hand-pollinated plants in comparison with the control plants. An average-sized plant that produces a fruit in the current year results in an estimated 10%-13% decrease in leaf area and a 5%-16% decrease in the probability of flowering in the following year. Plants that are experimentally defoliated are still capable of maturing their fruit, even though these plants have a decreased probability of flowering in the following year. These results show that long-term studies in the field are capable of demonstrating a cost of reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
Cited by
The costs of reproduction in plants
Obeso, J. R. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x · Cited by 1,377
A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants
Larson, B. M. H., & Barrett, S. C. H. (2000) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.1999.0372 · Cited by 697
Herrera, C. M. (1993) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937101 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Primack, R. B., & Hall, P.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 638-656
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2055463268
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Costs of Reproduction in the Pink Lady's Slipper Orchid: A Four-Year Experimental Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285120
- The paper
- Primack, R. B., & Hall, P. (1990). Costs of Reproduction in the Pink Lady's Slipper Orchid: A Four-Year Experimental Study. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.