The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Conditions for Evolutionary Stability for a Continuously Varying Character
Abstract
The two conditions for stability of an evolutionary equilibrium, the m-stability and the δ-stability conditions, are discussed. The m-stability condition is a condition for the convergence of the population toward the equilibrium, and the δ-stability condition coresponds to a local version of the classic evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) condition. Together the two conditions provide the condition for a continuous stable strategy. The convergence stability condition corresponds to the requirement for convergence due to initial increase of rare alleles in a monomorphic population, and the local ESS stability condition corresponds to the stability of a monomorphic population at the evolutionary equilibrium against the increase of rare alleles. In this way, an evolutionary equilibrium that is convergence stable, but not local ESS stable, will tend to become polymorphic. The local ESS stability condition therefore contributes more to a description of the dynamics of variation at an evolutionary equilibrium than to the description of the stability of the evolutionary equilibrium. However, the characterization of a polymorphic evolutionary equilibrium cannot be reached by studying the initial increase of rare variant alleles, just as this method cannot describe all aspects of the convergence stability either. Combining these analyses provides a powerful tool in the initial exploration of evolutionary equilibriums of complicated systems, and convergence stable and local ESS unstable equilibriums point toward very interesting polymorphic evolutionary stable states. The analysis is illustrated on a model for intraspecific exploitative competition that may show monomorphic and polymorphic evolutionarily stable equilibriums.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMITH, J. M., & PRICE, G. R. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246015a0 · Cited by 5,089
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
Macarthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282505 · Cited by 4,611
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.
Fisher, R. A. (1919) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0080456800012163 · Cited by 4,387
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
LEVINS, R. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh · Cited by 3,383
The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts
Maynard Smith, J. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6 · Cited by 2,410
PRICE, G. R. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227520a0 · Cited by 1,964
The theory of evolution and dynamical systems
Hofbauer, J. (1988) · Cited by 1,301
Evolutionary and continuous stability
Eshel, I. (1983) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(83)90201-1 · Cited by 627
A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics
Hofbauer, J., Schuster, P., & Sigmund, K. (1979) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(79)90058-4 · Cited by 304
Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection
Taylor, P. D. (1989) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(89)90025-7 · Cited by 270
Population Genetics and Ecology.
Green, R. F., Karlin, S., & Nevo, E. (1976) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529765 · Cited by 268
Theories of Populations in Biological Communities
Christiansen, F. B., & Fenchel, T. M. (1977) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66526-4 · Cited by 251
Self-citationKin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help
Eshel, I., & Motro, U. (1981) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(81)90029-0 · Cited by 202
Evolutionary stability: One concept, several meanings
Lessard, S. (1990) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(90)90033-r · Cited by 77
Uyenoyama, M. K., & BENGTSSON, B. O. (1982) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(82)90035-1 · Cited by 63
Frequency dependence and competition
Christiansen, F. B. (1988) · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1988.0067 · Cited by 49
Self-citationLoeschcke, V., & Christiansen, F. (1984) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(84)90031-5 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Cited by
Evolutionary Dynamics of Biological Games
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093411 · Cited by 1,184
The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes
Dieckmann, U., & Law, R. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf02409751 · Cited by 1,156
Local Competition, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex‐Biased Dispersal
Perrin, N., & Mazalov, V. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303296 · Cited by 477
Ravigné, V., Dieckmann, U., & Olivieri, I. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/605369 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Christiansen, F. B.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-50
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2002603593
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.