CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,089

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Logic of Animal Conflict

SMITH, J. MAYNARD, PRICE, G. R.·1973·Nature
DOI 10.1038/246015a0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/246015a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evolutionary game theory is a useful approach to depict the equilibrium strategies of multiple stakeholders within a system by providing the dynamic evolutionary process.

    “evolutionary game theory is a useful approach to depict the equilibrium strategies of multiple stakeholders within the system by providing the dynamic evolutionary process 31 , which has been widely applied to the analysis of complex multi-actors system, including the waste management systems 19,32,33 .”

    From Characterizing the polycentricity in waste governance: a comparative study on Shanghai, Tokyo, and Hong Kong (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Shaw, C. E., Herpetologica, 4, 137 (1948).
  2. Shaw, C. E., Herpetologica, 7, 149 (1951).
  3. Linsdale, J. M., and Tomich, P. Q., A Herd of Mule Deer, 511f (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1953).
  4. Darwin, C., The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, chap. 17 (Murray, London, 1882). · DOI
  5. Collins, N. E., Physiol. Zool., 17, 83 (1944). · DOI
  6. Hingston, R. W. G., Character Person., 2, 3 (1933). · DOI
  7. Huxley, J. S., Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 251 B, 249 (1956).
  8. Lorenz, K., On Aggression (Methuen, London, 1966).
  9. Wynne-Edwards, V. C., Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour, chap. 8 (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London, 1962).
  10. Maynard Smith, J., Nature, 201, 1145 (1964). · DOI
  11. Levins, R., in Some Mathematical Questions in Biology (American Mathematical Society, 1970).
  12. Price, G. R., Ann. hum. Genet., 35, 485 (1972). · DOI
  13. MacArthur, R. H., in Theoretical and Mathematical Biology (edit. by Waterman, T., and Horowitz, H.) (Blaisdell, New York, 1965).
  14. Hamilton, W. D., Science, N.Y., 156, 477 (1967). · DOI
  15. Dingle, H., Anim. Behav., 17, 561 (1969). · DOI
  16. West, L. J., Pierce, C. M., and Thomas, W. D., Science, N.Y., 138, 1100 (1962). · DOI
  17. Eisenberg, J. F., McKay, G. M., and Jainudeen, M. R., Behaviour, 38, 193 (1971). · DOI
  18. Price, J. S., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 62, 1107 (1969).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
SMITH, J. M., & PRICE, G. R.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1973-11
Volume
246
Issue
5427
Pages
15-18
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/246015a0
Cited by
5,089
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review