Cited by 122Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsLabor market dynamics and wage inequalitySocial Policy and Reform Studies

Economic Response to a Guaranteed Annual Income: Experience from Canada and the United States

Hum, Derek, Simpson, Wayne·1993·Journal of Labor Economics

Abstract

This article reviews research from the five income-maintenance experiments in Canada and the United States. After sketching the historical and political context of the experiments, we compare their designs and discuss some important analytic difficulties. Our primary focus is the work-incentive issue, both nonstructural estimates of the experimental effects and elasticity estimates of structural labor-supply functions. We provide initial estimates of nonstructural and structural models for the Canadian experiment. We discuss more briefly some non-work-response findings associated with a guaranteed annual income and offer some personal comments on social experimentation and the policy process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/298335

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hum, D., & Simpson, W.
Venue
Journal of Labor Economics
Published
1993-01
Volume
11
Issue
1, Part 2
Pages
S263-S296
ISSN
  • 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5307
OpenAlex
W2013291500
Cited by
122
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
guaranteed annual income, income support, work incentives, labor supply elasticity, social experiment, policy process, Canada, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review