Egypt and Syro‐Mesopotamia in the 4th Millennium: Implications of the New Chronology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New chronometric estimates from Egypt accommodate the evidence for Mesopotamian influences in Egypt far better than had previously been the case.
“The new chronometric estimates from Egypt accommodate the evidence for Mesopotamian influences in Egypt far better than had previously been the case (Joffe 2000;Stevenson 2012).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Joffe 2000
The revision of temporal frameworks for fourth millennium BC Mesopotamia is meaningful in light of the more recent reassessment of Predynastic Egyptian chronology.
“The revision of temporal frameworks for fourth millennium BC Mesopotamia (Joffe 2000;Schwartz 2001;Wright and Rupley 2001) is meaningful in light of the more recent reassessment of Predynastic Egyptian chronology.”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Joffe 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of the Bronze Age Levant
Greenberg, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316275993 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Egypt and Mesopotamia.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Joffe, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Joffe, Alexander H.
- ORCID
- Joffe, Alexander H.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-123
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2102376850
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 39 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 144.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- 4th millennium BC, Egypt, chronology, prehistoric archaeology, Uruk period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
