Cited by 370Connective tissue disorders researchProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsDermatological and Skeletal Disorders

Human Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Type VII C and Bovine Dermatosparaxis Are Caused by Mutations in the Procollagen I N-Proteinase Gene

Open access
Colige, Alain, Sieron, Aleksander L., Li, Shi-Wu, Schwarze, Ulrike, Petty, Elizabeth, Wertelecki, Wladimir, Wilcox, William, Krakow, Deborah +6 more·1999·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) type VIIC is a recessively inherited connective-tissue disorder, characterized by extreme skin fragility, characteristic facies, joint laxity, droopy skin, umbilical hernia, and blue sclera. Like the animal model dermatosparaxis, EDS type VIIC results from the absence of activity of procollagen I N-proteinase (pNPI), the enzyme that excises the N-propeptide of type I and type II procollagens. The pNPI enzyme is a metalloproteinase containing properdin repeats and a cysteine-rich domain with similarities to the disintegrin domain of reprolysins. We used bovine cDNA to isolate human pNPI. The human enzyme exists in two forms: a long version similar to the bovine enzyme and a short version that contains the Zn++-binding catalytic site but lacks the entire C-terminal domain in which the properdin repeats are located. We have identified the mutations that cause EDS type VIIC in the six known affected human individuals and also in one strain of dermatosparactic calf. Five of the individuals with EDS type VIIC were homozygous for a C-->T transition that results in a premature termination codon, Q225X. Four of these five patients were homozygous at three downstream polymorphic sites. The sixth patient was homozygous for a different transition that results in a premature termination codon, W795X. In the dermatosparactic calf, the mutation is a 17-bp deletion that changes the reading frame of the message. These data provide direct evidence that EDS type VIIC and dermatosparaxis result from mutations in the pNPI gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/302504

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dermatosparaxis EDS is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in ADAMTS2, the gene encoding ADAMTS-2.

    “Dermatosparaxis EDS (dEDS) is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in ADAMTS2, the gene that encodes ADAMTS-2.”

    From The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types (2017) · cites this paper as Colige et al., 1999

  • Mutations in ADAMTS2 result in decreased activity of ADAMTS-2, leading to defects in processing of type I procollagen to mature type I collagen.

    “The mutations result in decreased activity of ADAMTS-2, which leads to defects in processing of type I procollagen to mature type I collagen [Colige et al., 1999;Colige et al., 2004;Van Damme et al., 2016].”

    From The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types (2017) · cites this paper as Colige et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colige, A., Sieron, A. L., Li, S.-W., Schwarze, U., Petty, E., Wertelecki, W., Wilcox, W., Krakow, D., Cohn, D. H., Reardon, W., Byers, P. H., Lapière, C. M., Prockop, D. J., & Nusgens, B. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of South Alabama (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Colige, Alain
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-08
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
308-317
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081172215
Cited by
370
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AR 21557, AR 39837, HD 22657)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (3.4529.95)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Keywords
dermatosparaxis, genetic mutations, premature stop codon, connective tissue diseases, skin fragility, cysteine-rich domain, bovine model, cDNA cloning
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Cells, Cultured, Cloning, Molecular, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Mutational Analysis, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Fibroblasts, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Procollagen N-Endopeptidase, RNA, Messenger, Alternative Splicing, Codon, Terminator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review