The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographic Patterns in the Evolution of Resistance and Virulence in Drosophila and Its Parasitoids
Abstract
Many insects are attacked by internal parasitoids against which they mount a largely cellular immunological defense. The resistance of a host and the virulence of a parasitoid determine which species survives after parasitism. Drosophila is parasitized by several hymenopterous parasitoids, especially those in the genera Asobara and Leptopilina. Geographic patterns have been found in parasitoid virulence and host resistance, the clearest of which is a cline in Asobara tabida virulence from the north (low) to the south (high) of Europe. Drosophila melanogaster resistance is highest in central-southern Europe and lower elsewhere. We review and interpret these patterns in the light of recent experimental and theoretical studies of the evolution and coevolution of these traits. We find no evidence for genotype-specific virulence and defense, which makes "Red Queen"-type coevolution unlikely. The most important explanation for the patterns is geographic differences in host-parasitoid community structure. Asobara tabida virulence is positively correlated with the resistance of its main hosts, and there is more limited evidence that D. melanogaster resistance is influenced by the virulence of its parasitoids. We critically appraise whether the evidence available so far supports a coevolutionary explanation for the levels of these traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance
Holliday, R. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0015 · Cited by 2,279
The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence
Abrams, P. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79 · Cited by 912
Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts
Woolhouse, M. E. J., Webster, J. P., Domingo, E., Charlesworth, B., & Levin, B. R. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1202-569 · Cited by 869
Specific Hypotheses on the Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution
Thompson, J. N. (1999) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303208 · Cited by 674
Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity
Altizer, S., Harvell, D., & Friedle, E. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.013 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraaijeveld, A. R., & Godfray, H. C. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- S61-S74
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2022244702
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic Patterns in the Evolution of Resistance and Virulence in Drosophila and Its Parasitoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303212
- The paper
- Kraaijeveld, A. R., & Godfray, H. C. J. (1999). Geographic Patterns in the Evolution of Resistance and Virulence in Drosophila and Its Parasitoids. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.