The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing Early Events in Eukaryotic Evolution
Abstract
Resolving the order of events that occurred during the transition from prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells remains one of the greatest problems in cell evolution. One view, the Archezoa hypothesis, proposes that the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria occurred relatively late in eukaryotic evolution and that several mitochondrion-lacking protist groups diverged before the establishment of the organelle. Phylogenies based on small subunit ribosomal RNA and several protein-coding genes supported this proposal, placing amitochondriate protists such as diplomonads, parabasalids, and Microsporidia as the earliest diverging eukaryotic lineages. However, trees of other molecules, such as tubulins, heat shock protein 70, TATA box-binding protein, and the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, indicate that Microsporidia are not deeply branching eukaryotes but instead are close relatives of the Fungi. Furthermore, recent discoveries of mitochondrion-derived genes in the nuclear genomes of entamoebae, Microsporidia, parabasalids, and diplomonads suggest that these organisms likely descend from mitochondrion-bearing ancestors. Although several protist lineages formally remain as candidates for Archezoa, most evidence suggests that the mitochondrial endosymbiosis took place prior to the divergence of all extant eukaryotes. In addition, discoveries of proteobacterial-like nuclear genes coding for cytoplasmic proteins indicate that the mitochondrial symbiont may have contributed more to the eukaryotic lineage than previously thought. As genome sequence data from parabasalids and diplomonads accumulate, it is becoming clear that the last common ancestor of these protist taxa and other extant eukaryotic groups already possessed many of the complex features found in most eukaryotes but lacking in prokaryotes. However, our confidence in the deeply branching position of diplomonads and parabasalids among eukaryotes is weakened by conflicting phylogenies and potential sources of artifact. Our current picture of early eukaryotic evolution is in a state of flux.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria
Andersson, S. G. E., Zomorodipour, A., Andersson, J. O., Sicheritz-Pontén, T., Alsmark, U. C. M., Podowski, R. M., Näslund, A. K., Eriksson, A.-S., Winkler, H. H., & Kurland, C. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24094 · Cited by 1,697
The Hydrogen Hypothesis for the First Eukaryote
Martin, W., & Müller, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/32096 · Cited by 1,282
Stanier, R. Y., & Niel, C. B. (1962) · Archiv f�r Mikrobiologie · doi:10.1007/bf00425185 · Cited by 419
How good are deep phylogenetic trees?
Philippe, H., & Laurent, J. (1998) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80028-2 · Cited by 324 · cited 1×
“…from violation of simple evolutionary models and long-branch attraction may be sufficient to cause the artifactual grouping of diplomonads and parabasalids with the long branch leading to outgroup sequences, a problem that is pervasive in deep phylogenetic analyses (Philippe and Laurent 1998).”
BackgroundThe Rooting of the Universal Tree of Life Is Not Reliable
Philippe, H., & Forterre, P. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/pl00006573 · Cited by 267
Martin, W., & Schnarrenberger, C. (1997) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s002940050241 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution
Keeling, P. J., & Palmer, J. D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2386 · Cited by 1,355
The Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria
Roger, A. J., Muñoz-Gómez, S. A., & Kamikawa, R. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015 · Cited by 1,142
Self-citationEukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
Martin, W., & Russell, M. J. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1183 · Cited by 856
The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants
Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2005) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-1 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Roger, A. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- S4
- Pages
- S146-S163
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1991877552
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing Early Events in Eukaryotic Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303290
- The paper
- Roger, A. J. (1999). Reconstructing Early Events in Eukaryotic Evolution. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.