The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes
Open accessAbstract
Models of metapopulations have focused on the effects of extinction and colonization rate upon metapopulation persistence and dynamics, assuming static landscapes wherein patches are neither created nor go extinct. However, for species living in ephemeral (patchy) habitats, landscapes are highly dynamic rather than static. In this article, we develop a lattice metapopulation model, of the patch occupancy type, based on interacting particle systems that incorporate explicitly both metapopulation and patch dynamics. Under this scenario, we study the effects of different regimes of patch dynamics upon metapopulation persistence. We analyze the lattice behavior by numerical simulations and a mean field approximation (MF). We show that metapopulation persistence and extinction are strongly influenced by the rate at which the landscape changes, in addition to the amount of habitat destroyed. We derive MF analytical expressions for extinction thresholds related to landscape properties such as habitat suitability and patch average lifetime. Using numerical simulations, we also show how these thresholds are quantitatively overestimated by the MF equations, although the qualitative behavior of the spatial model is well explained by the MF when the array of habitat patches is dynamic or static but connected in space and time. The implications for conservation are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988
Skole, D., & Tucker, C. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.260.5116.1905 · Cited by 1,590
Cited by
SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY
Moilanen, A., & Nieminen, M. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:scmise]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 709
Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities
FULLERTON, A. H., BURNETT, K. M., STEEL, E. A., FLITCROFT, R. L., PESS, G. R., FEIST, B. E., TORGERSEN, C. E., MILLER, D. J., & SANDERSON, B. L. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02448.x · Cited by 379
Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance
Johst, K., Brandl, R., & Eber, S. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980208.x · Cited by 238
Connectivity measures: a review
Kindlmann, P., & Burel, F. (2008) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9245-4 · Cited by 124
The roles and impacts of human hunter-gatherers in North Pacific marine food webs
Dunne, J. A., Maschner, H., Betts, M. W., Huntly, N., Russell, R., Williams, R. J., & Wood, S. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21179 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Keymer, J. E., Marquet, P. A., Velasco‐Hernández, J. X., & Levin, S. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 478-494
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2178056246
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303407
- The paper
- Keymer, J. E., Marquet, P. A., Velasco‐Hernández, J. X., & Levin, S. A. (2000). Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/303407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.