The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Weak Lensing by a Cluster of Galaxies at z= 0.83
Open accessAbstract
We report the detection of weak gravitational lensing of faint, distant background galaxies by the rich, X-ray luminous cluster of galaxies MS 1054-03 at z = 0.83. This is the first measurement of weak lensing by a bona fide cluster at such a high redshift. We detect tangential shear at the 5%-10% level over a range of radii 50'' ≲ r ≲ 250'' centered on the optical position of the cluster. Two-dimensional mass reconstruction using galaxies with 21.5 < I < 25.5 shows a strong peak which coincides with the peak of the smoothed cluster light distribution. Splitting this sample by magnitude (at I = 23.5) and color (at R - I = 0.7), we find that the brighter and redder subsamples are only very weakly distorted, indicating that the faint blue galaxies (FBGs), which dominate the shear signal, are relatively more distant. The derived cluster mass is quite sensitive to the N ( z ) for the FBGs. At one extreme, if all the FBGs are at z s = 3, then the mass within a 0.5 h -1 Mpc aperture is (5.9 ± 1.24) × 10 14 h -1 M ☉ , and the mass-to-light ratio is M / L V = 350 ± 70 h in solar units. For z s = 1.5 the derived mass is ~70% higher and M / L ≃ 580 h . If N ( z ) follows the no evolution model (in shape) then M / L ≃ 800 h , and if all the FBGs lie at z s ≲ 1 the required M / L exceeds 1600 h . These data provide clear evidence that large, dense mass concentrations existed at early epochs; that they can be weighed efficiently by weak lensing observations; and that, for a plausible cluster mass, most of the FBGs must lie at high redshift ( z > 1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Bacon, D., Berge, J., Bernstein, G., Bertin, E., Bridle, S., Brown, M. L., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., et al. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x · Cited by 508
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
Mellier, Y. (1999) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.127 · Cited by 490
Shapelets -- I. A method for image analysis
Refregier, A. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.05901.x · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Luppino, G. A., & Kaiser, N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-01-20
- Volume
- 475
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-28
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2082892318
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Weak Lensing by a Cluster of Galaxies at z= 0.83. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303508
- The paper
- Luppino, G. A., & Kaiser, N. (1997). Detection of Weak Lensing by a Cluster of Galaxies at z= 0.83. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/303508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.