Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 564

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters

Open access
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., Ellingson, E.·1997·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The systematic errors in the virial mass-to-light ratio, M v / L , of galaxy clusters as an estimator of the field M / L value are assessed. We overlay 14 clusters in redshift space to create an ensemble cluster that averages over substructure and asymmetries. The combined sample, including background, contains about 1150 galaxies, extending to a projected radius of about twice r 200 . The radius r 200 , defined as where the mean interior density is 200 times the critical density, is expected to contain the bulk of the virialized cluster mass. The dynamically derived M ( r 200 )/ L ( r 200 ) of the ensemble is (0.82 ± 0.14)⟨ M v / L ⟩. The M v / L overestimate is attributed to not taking into account the surface pressure term in the virial equation. Under the assumption that the velocity anisotropy parameter is in the range 0 ≤ β ≤ 2/3, the galaxy distribution accurately traces the mass profile beyond about the central 0.3 r 200 . There are no color or luminosity gradients in the galaxy population beyond 2 r 200 , but there is 0.11 ± 0.05 mag fading in the r -band luminosities between the field and cluster galaxies. We correct the cluster virial mass-to-light ratio, M v / L = 289 ± 50 h M ☉ / L ☉ (calculated assuming q 0 = 0.1), for the biases in M v and mean luminosity to estimate the field M / L = 213 ± 59 h M ☉ / L ☉ . With our self-consistently derived field luminosity density, j /ρ c = 1136 ± 138 h M ☉ / L ☉ (at z ≃ 1/3), the corrected M / L indicates Ω 0 = 0.19 ± 0.06 ± 0.04 (formal 1 σ random error and estimated potential systematic errors) for those components of the mass field in rich clusters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/303805

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 564

Metadata

Authors
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., & Ellingson, E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1997-04
Volume
478
Issue
2
Pages
462-475
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1993535134
Cited by
564
References
2
FWCI
25.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303805
The paper
Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., & Ellingson, E. (1997). The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/303805

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.