The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters
Open accessAbstract
The systematic errors in the virial mass-to-light ratio, M v / L , of galaxy clusters as an estimator of the field M / L value are assessed. We overlay 14 clusters in redshift space to create an ensemble cluster that averages over substructure and asymmetries. The combined sample, including background, contains about 1150 galaxies, extending to a projected radius of about twice r 200 . The radius r 200 , defined as where the mean interior density is 200 times the critical density, is expected to contain the bulk of the virialized cluster mass. The dynamically derived M ( r 200 )/ L ( r 200 ) of the ensemble is (0.82 ± 0.14)⟨ M v / L ⟩. The M v / L overestimate is attributed to not taking into account the surface pressure term in the virial equation. Under the assumption that the velocity anisotropy parameter is in the range 0 ≤ β ≤ 2/3, the galaxy distribution accurately traces the mass profile beyond about the central 0.3 r 200 . There are no color or luminosity gradients in the galaxy population beyond 2 r 200 , but there is 0.11 ± 0.05 mag fading in the r -band luminosities between the field and cluster galaxies. We correct the cluster virial mass-to-light ratio, M v / L = 289 ± 50 h M ☉ / L ☉ (calculated assuming q 0 = 0.1), for the biases in M v and mean luminosity to estimate the field M / L = 213 ± 59 h M ☉ / L ☉ . With our self-consistently derived field luminosity density, j /ρ c = 1136 ± 138 h M ☉ / L ☉ (at z ≃ 1/3), the corrected M / L indicates Ω 0 = 0.19 ± 0.06 ± 0.04 (formal 1 σ random error and estimated potential systematic errors) for those components of the mass field in rich clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Cited by
Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 · Cited by 2,772
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Wang, L., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306436 · Cited by 933
Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Kauffmann, G., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x · Cited by 728
The Evolution of X-Ray Clusters of Galaxies
Rosati, P., Borgani, S., & Norman, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.120401.150547 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., & Ellingson, E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 478
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 462-475
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1993535134
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/303805
- The paper
- Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C., & Ellingson, E. (1997). The Average Mass and Light Profiles of Galaxy Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/303805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.