The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shear and Ellipticity in Gravitational Lenses
Open accessAbstract
Galaxies modeled as singular isothermal ellipsoids with an axis ratio distribution similar to the observed axis ratio distribution of E and S0 galaxies are statistically consistent with both the observed numbers of two-image and four-image lenses and the inferred ellipticities of individual lenses. However, no four-image lens is well fitted by the model (typical χ 2 / N dof ~ 20), the axis ratio of the model can be significantly different from that of the observed lens galaxy, and the major axes of the model and the galaxy may be slightly misaligned. We found that models with a second, independent, external shear axis could fit the data well (typical χ 2 / N dof ~ 1), while adding the same number of extra parameters to the radial mass distribution does not produce such a dramatic improvement in the fit. An independent shear axis can be produced by misalignments between the luminous galaxy and its dark matter halo, or by external shear perturbations due to galaxies and clusters correlated with the primary lens or along the line of sight. We estimate that the external shear perturbations have no significant effect on the expected numbers of two-image and four-image lenses but that they can be important perturbations in individual lens models. However, the amplitudes of the external shears required to produce good fits are larger than our estimates for typical external shear perturbations (10%-15% shear instead of 1%-3%), suggesting that the origin of the extra angular structure must be intrinsic to the primary lens galaxy in most cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies.
Schechter, P. (1976) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/154079 · Cited by 2,870
Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω
Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/282.1.263 · Cited by 1,137
0957 + 561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens?
Walsh∗, D., Carswell†, R. F., & Weymann‡, R. J. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/279381a0 · Cited by 994
Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies
Kaiser, N. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171151 · Cited by 833
Non-linear evolution of cosmological power spectra
Peacock, J. A., & Dodds, S. J. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/280.3.l19 · Cited by 783
The morphology-density relation - The group connection
Postman, M., & Geller, M. J. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/162078 · Cited by 646
Turner, E. L., Ostriker, J. P., & Gott, J. R., III (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/162379 · Cited by 636
Dark halos formed via dissipationless collapse. I - Shapes and alignment of angular momentum
Warren, M. S., Quinn, P. J., Salmon, J. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171937 · Cited by 536
The Stromlo-APM Redshift Survey. I - The luminosity function and space density of galaxies
Loveday, J., Peterson, B. A., Efstathiou, G., & Maddox, S. J. (1992) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/171284 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Evidence for substructure in lens galaxies?
Mao, S., & Schneider, P. (1998) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01319.x · Cited by 527
Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys
Oguri, M., & Marshall, P. J. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16639.x · Cited by 425
The Mass Distribution of SDSS J1004$+$4112 Revisited
Oguri, M. (2010) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/62.4.1017 · Cited by 347
Gilman, D., Birrer, S., Nierenberg, A., Treu, T., Du, X., & Benson, A. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3480 · Cited by 268
Goldstein, D. A., Nugent, P. E., Kasen, D. N., & Collett, T. E. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa975 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeton, C. R., Kochanek, C. S., & Seljak, U.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-06-20
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 604-620
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2034354396
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shear and Ellipticity in Gravitational Lenses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/304172
- The paper
- Keeton, C. R., Kochanek, C. S., & Seljak, U. (1997). Shear and Ellipticity in Gravitational Lenses. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/304172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.